Coffey Michael, Hewitt Jeanette
Community Mental Health Nursing, Centre for Mental Health Studies, School of Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(12):1591-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02185.x.
To explore service user and community mental health nurses views on responses to voice hearing experiences.
People who hear distressing auditory hallucinations (voices) are often in contact with mental health services. Nursing responses to this experience have been limited, although emerging evidence suggests some utilitarian alternative interventions, such as discussing the content and meaning of the voices.
Using exploratory interviews, this study investigated the response to voice hearing, with a purposive sample of community mental health nurses (n = 20) and service users (n = 20). This paper reports on a thematic content analysis of transcribed interviews, which highlighted differences in perspectives of voice hearers and the nurses supporting them.
Voice hearers reported that interventions from community mental health nurses were limited to reviews of medication, access to the psychiatrist and non-directive counselling. They identified alternative needs, which involved talking more about the content and meaning of their voices. Conversely, community mental health nurses regarded their responses to voice hearing as being considered, titrated and demonstrating an awareness of the personal contexts of service users. These responses were however restricted by their perception of skill limitations.
The contrasting views of nurses and users of services demonstrated in this study, reveal multiple social realities that represent a challenge to accepted professional responses in the provision of mental health care.
People who hear voices express an interest in more helpful responses from community mental health nurses. The findings of this study indicate that nurses must begin to orientate themselves towards a more critical practice stance that encompasses available knowledge on the voice hearing experience.
探讨服务使用者和社区精神科护士对幻听体验应对方式的看法。
经历令人痛苦的幻听(声音)的人常常与精神卫生服务机构有接触。尽管新出现的证据表明一些实用的替代干预措施,如讨论幻听的内容和意义,但护理人员对此类体验的应对措施一直有限。
本研究采用探索性访谈,对社区精神科护士(n = 20)和服务使用者(n = 20)进行了有目的抽样,调查对幻听的应对情况。本文报告了对访谈转录内容的主题内容分析,突出了幻听患者及其支持护士观点的差异。
幻听患者报告称,社区精神科护士的干预措施仅限于药物复查、与精神科医生接触以及非指导性咨询。他们提出了其他需求,包括更多地谈论幻听的内容和意义。相反,社区精神科护士认为他们对幻听的应对是经过深思熟虑、适度调整的,并表明他们了解服务使用者的个人背景。然而,这些应对措施受到他们对自身技能限制认知的制约。
本研究中护士与服务使用者的不同观点揭示了多种社会现实,这对精神卫生保健提供中被认可的专业应对构成了挑战。
有幻听的人表示希望社区精神科护士能提供更有帮助的应对措施。本研究结果表明,护士必须开始将自己定位为一种更具批判性的实践立场,涵盖有关幻听体验的现有知识。