Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20;28(15):2556-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2106. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
The aim was to investigate whether germline polymorphisms within candidate genes known or suspected to be involved in fluorouracil (FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan pathways were associated with toxicity and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Blood samples from 349 patients included in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 2000-05 randomized trial, which compared FU plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) followed by FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) followed by FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; sequential arm) with FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (combination arm) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, were collected. Twenty polymorphisms within the DPD, TS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and UGT1A1 genes were genotyped.
The ERCC2-K751QC allele was independently associated with an increased risk of FOLFOX-induced grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .01). In the sequential arm, TS-5'UTR3RG and GSTT1 alleles were independently associated with response to LV5FU2 (P = .009) and FOLFOX (P = .01), respectively. The effect of oxaliplatin on tumor response increased with the number of MTHFR-1298C alleles (test for trend, P = .008). The PFS benefit from first-line FOLFOX was restricted to patients with 2R/2R (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68) or 2R/3R (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.82) TS-5'UTR genotypes, respectively. Conversely, patients with the TS-5'UTR 3R/3R genotype did not seem to benefit from the adjunction of oxaliplatin (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.40; trend between the three HRs, P = .006).
A pharmacogenetic approach may be a useful strategy for personalizing and optimizing chemotherapy in mCRC patients and deserves confirmation in additional prospective studies.
本研究旨在探究种系突变是否与转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的氟尿嘧啶(FU)、奥沙利铂和伊立替康相关毒性和临床结局相关,候选基因包括已知或疑似参与 FU、奥沙利铂和伊立替康途径的基因。
349 例患者的血液样本来自于 2000 年至 2005 年期间法国消化肿瘤学会开展的一项随机临床试验,该试验比较了 FU 联合亚叶酸(LV5FU2)随后 FU、亚叶酸和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)随后 FU、亚叶酸和伊立替康(FOLFIRI;序贯组)与 FOLFOX 随后 FOLFIRI(联合组)在无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期方面的疗效。共检测了 20 个位于 DPD、TS、MTHFR、ERCC1、ERCC2、GSTP1、GSTM1、GSTT1 和 UGT1A1 基因内的多态性。
ERCC2-K751QC 等位基因与 FOLFOX 诱导的 3 级或 4 级血液学毒性风险增加独立相关(P =.01)。在序贯组中,TS-5'UTR3RG 和 GSTT1 等位基因与对 LV5FU2(P =.009)和 FOLFOX(P =.01)的反应独立相关。奥沙利铂对肿瘤反应的影响随着 MTHFR-1298C 等位基因数量的增加而增加(趋势检验,P =.008)。一线 FOLFOX 治疗的 PFS 获益仅限于 TS-5'UTR 基因型为 2R/2R(风险比[HR] = 0.39;95%CI,0.23 至 0.68)或 2R/3R(HR = 0.59;95%CI,0.42 至 0.82)的患者。相反,具有 TS-5'UTR 3R/3R 基因型的患者似乎不能从奥沙利铂联合治疗中获益(HR = 0.96;95%CI,0.66 至 1.40;三个 HR 之间的趋势检验,P =.006)。
药物遗传学方法可能是一种用于 mCRC 患者化疗个体化和优化的有用策略,值得在更多的前瞻性研究中进一步验证。