• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者期望对脊柱创伤治疗后结果的影响:第 1 部分:脊柱外科医生对患者说了什么?

The impact of patient expectations on outcome following treatment for spinal trauma: Part 1: What are spine surgeons telling their patients?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Spine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):1807-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c15b5d.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c15b5d
PMID:20386504
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Surgeon completed questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE

To determine information provided by spine surgeons to patients, part of a 4-part study determining the impact of patient expectations on outcome following spinal trauma.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An important goal of treatment is patient satisfaction, which may be influenced by patient expectations. Impact of patient expectations on outcome has been demonstrated in various elective orthopedic populations. It is anticipated that there will be similar, if not greater, impact on outcome in a trauma setting.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed, in a case-based format, to determine the information provided by spine surgeons to their patients. There were 3 questionnaires, each consisting of 5 cases and grouped by cervical spine trauma, thoracolumbar spine trauma, and spinal cord injury. These questionnaires were distributed to members of the Spine Trauma Study Group and our division. Statistical analysis consisted of a single-factor random effects model. In this analysis, the degree of variability was quantified as the ratio of surgeon induced variance over total variance for the questions.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were distributed to 54 surgeons and 31 responses received (57%). There was substantial variability in responses ranging from a ratio of 9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-26] for the regaining range of motion 1 year following cervical spine trauma domain to a ratio of 84% (95% CI: 69-92) for the early postoperative spasticity following spinal cord injury domain.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated substantial variability in the information provided by spine surgeons to spine trauma patients and the need to improve the quality of information provided, allowing patient expectations to be more appropriate, potentially maximizing their outcome. Further areas for study include, assessment of the best available evidence on which to base information provided to spinal trauma patients, determination of what information spinal trauma patients view as relevant and the effect appropriate expectations have on outcome.

摘要

研究设计

外科医生完成问卷调查。

目的

确定脊柱外科医生向患者提供的信息,这是一项 4 部分研究的一部分,旨在确定患者期望对脊柱创伤后结果的影响。

背景资料总结

治疗的一个重要目标是患者满意度,这可能受到患者期望的影响。在各种择期骨科人群中,已经证明了患者期望对结果的影响。预计在创伤环境中,这种影响即使没有更大,也会相似。

方法

以案例为基础的格式制定了一份问卷,以确定脊柱外科医生向其患者提供的信息。有 3 份问卷,每份问卷由 5 个案例组成,分为颈椎创伤、胸腰椎创伤和脊髓损伤。这些问卷分发给脊柱创伤研究小组和我们部门的成员。统计分析包括单因素随机效应模型。在这种分析中,外科医生引起的方差与问题的总方差之比被量化为方差的程度。

结果

向 54 名外科医生分发了问卷,收到 31 份回复(57%)。答复存在很大差异,从颈椎创伤领域 1 年后恢复活动范围的比例为 9%(95%置信区间[CI]:0-26)到脊髓损伤领域术后早期痉挛的比例为 84%(95% CI:69-92)。

结论

这项研究表明,脊柱外科医生向脊柱创伤患者提供的信息存在很大差异,需要提高信息提供的质量,使患者期望更加合理,从而最大限度地提高他们的结果。进一步的研究领域包括,评估提供给脊柱创伤患者的最佳现有证据,确定脊柱创伤患者认为哪些信息相关,以及适当的期望对结果的影响。

相似文献

1
The impact of patient expectations on outcome following treatment for spinal trauma: Part 1: What are spine surgeons telling their patients?患者期望对脊柱创伤治疗后结果的影响:第 1 部分:脊柱外科医生对患者说了什么?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):1807-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c15b5d.
2
A comparison of patient and surgeon preoperative expectations of spinal surgery.患者与外科医生对脊柱手术术前期望的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):1040-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318269c100.
3
Thromboprophylaxis in traumatic and elective spinal surgery: analysis of questionnaire response and current practice of spine trauma surgeons.创伤性和择期脊柱手术中的血栓预防:脊柱创伤外科医生问卷调查回复分析和当前实践。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 1;35(3):323-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ca652e.
4
Survey of spine surgeons on attitudes regarding osteoporosis and osteomalacia screening and treatment for fractures, fusion surgery, and pseudoarthrosis.脊柱外科医生对骨质疏松症和骨软化症筛查及骨折治疗、融合手术和假关节的态度调查。
Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
5
Thromboprophylaxis in spinal trauma surgery: consensus among spine trauma surgeons.脊柱创伤手术中的血栓预防:脊柱创伤外科医生的共识
Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
6
The effect of surgeon empathy and emotional intelligence on patient satisfaction.外科医生共情和情绪智力对患者满意度的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Dec;16(5):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9278-3. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
7
[Physicians's attitude toward patient education].[医生对患者教育的态度]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2003;57(3):531-40.
8
Patients' evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers?患者对全科医疗服务质量的评价:文化和语言障碍有哪些?
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jul;72(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 May 15.
9
Orthopaedists' and family practitioners' knowledge of simple low back pain management.骨科医生和家庭医生对简单下腰痛管理的认识。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):1600-3. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a96622.
10
The great gap. Physicians' perceptions of patient service quality expectations fall short of reality.巨大差距。医生对患者服务质量期望的认知与现实存在差距。
J Health Care Mark. 1994 Summer;14(2):32-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Enabling knowledge translation: implementation of a web-based tool for independent walking prediction after traumatic spinal cord injury.促进知识转化:实施一种用于创伤性脊髓损伤后独立行走预测的基于网络的工具。
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 5;14:1219307. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1219307. eCollection 2023.
2
Expectations of treatment outcomes in patients with spinal metastases; what do we tell our patients? A qualitative study.脊柱转移瘤患者对治疗结果的期望;我们该如何告知患者?一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):1263. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08993-0.
3
Training a Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Team in Motivational Interviewing.
对脊髓损伤康复团队进行动机性访谈培训。
Rehabil Res Pract. 2015;2015:358151. doi: 10.1155/2015/358151. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
4
The Practical Application of Clinical Prediction Rules: A Commentary Using Case Examples in Surgical Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.临床预测规则的实际应用:以退行性颈椎脊髓病手术患者为例的述评。
Global Spine J. 2015 Dec;5(6):457-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567838.
5
Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review.脊髓损伤中的知识转化与实施:一项系统综述
Spinal Cord. 2014 Aug;52(8):578-87. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.62. Epub 2014 May 6.
6
A synthesis of best available evidence and expert opinion on outcomes after cervical trauma: what should surgeons be telling their patients?关于颈椎创伤后预后的最佳现有证据与专家意见综述:外科医生应告知患者什么?
Evid Based Spine Care J. 2011 Nov;2(4):57-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1274759.