Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 May;6(5):301-5. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.45. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
The management of rheumatoid arthritis has greatly improved in the past decade, owing to new treatment strategies and the introduction of agents that inhibit tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Unfortunately, a substantial proportion of patients will discontinue therapy with their first TNF inhibitor for various reasons (for example, non-response, loss of efficacy, or toxicity). Until recently, treatment options for these patients were limited and most rheumatologists chose to switch to treatment with an alternative TNF inhibitor. However, biologic agents with different modes of action have now become available. Hence, the dilemma now facing rheumatologists presented with patients who fail to respond to anti-TNF therapy is whether to switch to an alternative TNF inhibitor or to change to a biologic agent of a different drug class. This article discusses the evidence relating to these two options.
过去十年中,由于新的治疗策略和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂的引入,类风湿关节炎的治疗有了很大的改善。不幸的是,由于各种原因(例如无应答、疗效丧失或毒性),相当一部分患者会停止使用他们的第一种 TNF 抑制剂。直到最近,这些患者的治疗选择有限,大多数风湿病学家选择改用另一种 TNF 抑制剂。然而,现在已有不同作用机制的生物制剂可供选择。因此,现在面临对 TNF 治疗无反应的患者的风湿病学家面临着一个困境,即是改用另一种 TNF 抑制剂还是改用另一种不同药物类别的生物制剂。本文讨论了与这两种选择相关的证据。