Department of Clinical, Health and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, POBox 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands.
Memory. 2010 Jan;18(1):76-84. doi: 10.1080/09658210903476522.
According to the dual representation theory of PTSD, intrusive trauma images and intrusive verbal thoughts are produced by separate memory systems. In a previous article it was shown that after watching an aversive film, participants in non-movement conditions reported more intrusive images than participants in a free-to-move control condition (Hagenaars, Van Minnen, Holmes, Brewin, & Hoogduin, 2008). The present study investigates whether the experimental conditions of the Hagenaars et al. study had a different effect on intrusive thoughts than on intrusive images. Experiment 2 further investigated the image-thoughts distinction by manipulating stimulus valence (trauma film versus neutral film) and assessing the subsequent development of intrusive images and thoughts. In addition, both experiments studied the impact of peri-traumatic emotions on subsequent intrusive images and thoughts frequency across conditions. Results showed that experimental manipulations (non-movement and trauma film) caused higher levels of intrusive images relative to control conditions (free movement and neutral film) but they did not affect intrusive thoughts. Peri-traumatic anxiety and horror were associated with subsequent higher levels of intrusive images, but not intrusive thoughts. Correlations were inconclusive for anger and sadness. The results suggest intrusive images and thoughts can be manipulated independently and as such can be considered different phenomena.
根据 PTSD 的双重表现理论,侵入性创伤图像和侵入性言语思维是由不同的记忆系统产生的。在之前的一篇文章中,研究人员发现,与自由运动对照组相比,在观看厌恶影片后,非运动条件下的参与者报告的侵入性图像更多(Hagenaars、Van Minnen、Holmes、Brewin 和 Hoogduin,2008 年)。本研究旨在调查 Hagenaars 等人的研究实验条件是否对侵入性思维的影响与侵入性图像不同。实验 2 通过操纵刺激效价(创伤影片与中性影片)和评估随后侵入性图像和思维的发展,进一步探究了图像-思维的区别。此外,这两个实验还研究了创伤前情绪在不同条件下对随后侵入性图像和思维频率的影响。结果表明,实验操作(非运动和创伤影片)导致侵入性图像水平高于对照条件(自由运动和中性影片),但不会影响侵入性思维。创伤前的焦虑和恐惧与随后侵入性图像水平的升高有关,但与侵入性思维无关。愤怒和悲伤的相关性尚无定论。研究结果表明,侵入性图像和思维可以独立操作,因此可以被视为不同的现象。