Burbelo Peter D, Issa Alexandra T, Ching Kathryn H, Cohen Jeffrey I, Iadarola Michael J, Marques Adriana
Neurobiology and Pain Therapeutics Section, 49 Convent Drive, Building 49, Room 1C20, NIDCR, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4410, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 Jun;17(6):904-9. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00476-09. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
There is currently a need for improved serological tests for the diagnosis and monitoring of Lyme disease, an infection caused by Borrelia burgdorferi. In the present study, we evaluated luciferase immunoprecipitation systems (LIPSs) for use for profiling of the antibody responses to a panel of B. burgdorferi proteins for the diagnosis of Lyme disease. Initially, serum samples from a cohort of patients and controls (n = 46) were used for training and were profiled by the use of 15 different B. burgdorferi antigen constructs. For the patient sera, the antibody responses to several B. burgdorferi antigens, including VlsE, flagellin (FlaB), BmpA, DbpA, and DbpB, indicated that the antigens had high levels of immunoreactivity. However, the best diagnostic performance was achieved with a synthetic protein, designated VOVO, consisting of a repeated antigenic peptide sequence, VlsE-OspC-VlsE-OspC, Analysis of an independent set of serum samples (n = 139) used for validation showed that the VOVO LIPS test had 98% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 93% to 100%; P < 0.0001) and 100% specificity (95% CI, 94% to 100%; P < 0.0001). Similarly, the C6 peptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) also had 98% sensitivity (95% CI, 93% to 100%; P < 0.0001) and 98% specificity (95% CI, 90% to 100%; P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the rates of detection of Lyme disease by the LIPS test and the C6 ELISA were not statistically different. However, the VOVO LIPS test displayed a wide dynamic range of antibody detection spanning over 10,000-fold without the need for serum dilution. These results suggest that screening by the LIPS test with VOVO and other B. burgdorferi antigens offers an efficient quantitative approach for evaluation of the antibody responses in patients with Lyme disease.
目前需要改进用于莱姆病诊断和监测的血清学检测方法,莱姆病是一种由伯氏疏螺旋体引起的感染。在本研究中,我们评估了荧光素酶免疫沉淀系统(LIPSs)用于分析针对一组伯氏疏螺旋体蛋白的抗体反应以诊断莱姆病。最初,使用一组患者和对照(n = 46)的血清样本进行训练,并通过使用15种不同的伯氏疏螺旋体抗原构建体进行分析。对于患者血清,对几种伯氏疏螺旋体抗原的抗体反应,包括VlsE、鞭毛蛋白(FlaB)、BmpA、DbpA和DbpB,表明这些抗原具有高水平的免疫反应性。然而,由一种合成蛋白VOVO(由重复的抗原肽序列VlsE-OspC-VlsE-OspC组成)获得了最佳诊断性能。对用于验证的一组独立血清样本(n = 139)的分析表明,VOVO LIPS检测的灵敏度为98%(95%置信区间[CI],93%至100%;P < 0.0001),特异性为100%(95% CI,94%至100%;P < 0.0001)。同样,C6肽酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的灵敏度也为98%(95% CI,93%至100%;P < 0.0001),特异性为98%(95% CI,90%至100%;P < 0.0001)。受试者工作特征分析显示,LIPS检测和C6 ELISA检测莱姆病的检出率无统计学差异。然而,VOVO LIPS检测显示出宽达10000倍以上的抗体检测动态范围,无需血清稀释。这些结果表明,用VOVO和其他伯氏疏螺旋体抗原进行LIPS检测筛查为评估莱姆病患者的抗体反应提供了一种有效的定量方法。