• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆结石碎石术的经济负担。成本会决定其命运吗?

The economic burden of gallstone lithotripsy. Will cost determine its fate?

作者信息

Nealon W H, Urrutia F, Fleming D, Thompson J C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):645-9; discussion 649-50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00015.

DOI:10.1097/00000658-199106000-00015
PMID:2039296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1358595/
Abstract

Gallstone lithotripsy (LITHO) was performed on 52 patients who underwent 107 procedures. Two hundred sixty-seven gallstone patients were screened and 215 (81%) were excluded. Excessive stone burden and nonvisualization by oral cholecystogram (OCG) were the most common reasons for exclusion. The hospital course of 100 excluded patients who later underwent elective cholecystectomy was evaluated for length of hospital stay (2.3 days) and total cost of treatment ($3685.00). Successful fragmentation to less than 5 mm was achieved in 43 LITHO patients (83%). Five LITHO patients (10%) required conversion to operative management. Complications of LITHO included acute cholecystitis (1 of 52 patients) and biliary colic (17 of 52 patients, or 33%). Multiple procedures in one patient were common. Costs for LITHO were calculated in two ways: first the individual cost for each of the 52 candidates; second the cost for successful LITHO was calculated by excluding five patients who required operation as well as five patients (10%) who are predicted failures of LITHO. Including the preoperative evaluation, treatment, recovery room, and follow-up, the individual LITHO cost for 52 patients was $8275.00. If the same total expenditure is calculated after excluding patients who required operation and those predicted to fail, the cost per 'successful' LITHO procedure was $10,245. The cost of 1 year of bile acid therapy is $1949.00 or $2413.00 per 'successful' procedure. Follow-up costs were $1232.00 per patient or $1525.00 per 'successful' procedure. The added LITHO cost incurred by screening eventual noncandidates was $904.00 per successful procedure. The sum of these individual costs was $15,087.00 per success, as compared to $3685.00 for cholecystectomy. No allowance was made for cost of stone recurrence. Lithotripsy costs appear to be sufficiently high to render the procedure unlikely to emerge as the treatment of choice.

摘要

对52例患者实施了107次胆结石碎石术(LITHO)。共筛查了267例胆结石患者,其中215例(81%)被排除。结石负荷过大和口服胆囊造影(OCG)未显像是最常见的排除原因。对100例后来接受择期胆囊切除术的排除患者的住院过程进行了评估,评估指标包括住院时间(2.3天)和治疗总费用(3685.00美元)。43例接受碎石术的患者(83%)成功将结石碎至小于5毫米。5例接受碎石术的患者(10%)需要转为手术治疗。碎石术的并发症包括急性胆囊炎(52例患者中的1例)和胆绞痛(52例患者中的17例,即33%)。一名患者进行多次手术的情况很常见。碎石术的费用通过两种方式计算:第一种是52名候选患者每人的个体费用;第二种是通过排除5名需要手术的患者以及5名预计碎石术失败的患者(10%)来计算成功碎石术的费用。包括术前评估、治疗、恢复室和随访,52例患者的个体碎石术费用为8275.00美元。如果在排除需要手术的患者和预计失败的患者后计算相同的总支出,每次“成功”的碎石术费用为10245美元。一年的胆汁酸治疗费用为1949.00美元或每次“成功”手术2413.00美元。随访费用为每名患者1232.00美元或每次“成功”手术1525.00美元。筛查最终非候选者所产生的额外碎石术费用为每次成功手术904.00美元。这些个体费用的总和为每次成功手术15087.00美元,而胆囊切除术的费用为3685.00美元。未考虑结石复发的费用。碎石术的成本似乎足够高,以至于该手术不太可能成为首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
The economic burden of gallstone lithotripsy. Will cost determine its fate?胆结石碎石术的经济负担。成本会决定其命运吗?
Ann Surg. 1991 Jun;213(6):645-9; discussion 649-50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00015.
2
Treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in France. A decision analysis comparing cholecystectomy and biliary lithotripsy.法国有症状胆结石的治疗。一项比较胆囊切除术和胆道碎石术的决策分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992 Winter;8(1):166-84. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008023.
3
Causes and management of recurrent biliary pain after successful nonoperative gallstone treatment.非手术治疗胆结石成功后复发性胆绞痛的病因及处理
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):132-8.
4
Gallstone lithotripsy vs cholecystectomy. A preliminary cost-benefit analysis.胆结石碎石术与胆囊切除术。初步成本效益分析。
Arch Surg. 1990 Jun;125(6):710-3; discussion 713-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410180028005.
5
Randomised controlled trial of cost-effectiveness of lithotripsy and open cholecystectomy as treatments for gallbladder stones.体外冲击波碎石术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石成本效益的随机对照试验
Lancet. 1992 Oct 3;340(8823):801-7. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92682-6.
6
[Cost comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of gallstones].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗胆结石的成本比较]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994 Nov 11;119(45):1532-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058868.
7
The role of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis.体外冲击波碎石术在有症状胆结石治疗中的作用。
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):162-7.
8
Costs and effectiveness of extracorporeal gallbladder stone shock wave lithotripsy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized clinical trial. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.体外冲击波碎石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本及效果:一项随机临床试验。麦吉尔胆结石治疗组
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997 Fall;13(4):589-601. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300010060.
9
Clinical results of piezoelectric gallstone lithotripsy.
Am Surg. 1992 Apr;58(4):243-8; discussion 248-9.
10
The pros and cons of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of gallstone disease.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与体外冲击波碎石术在胆结石疾病治疗中的利弊。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1):42-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Cholecystectomy in Choledocholithiasis Patients Underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.胆囊切除术在接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的胆总管结石患者中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 18;9(1):2168. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38428-z.
2
Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients.开腹胆囊切除术。对42474例患者的当代分析。
Ann Surg. 1993 Aug;218(2):129-37. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199308000-00003.

本文引用的文献

1
Gallstone lithotripsy: early American results and the new reality.胆结石碎石术:美国早期的结果及新的现状
J Lithotr Stone Dis. 1990 Jul;2(3):199-204.
2
Gallstone dissolution therapy. Current status and future prospects.胆结石溶解疗法。现状与未来展望。
Gastroenterology. 1986 Dec;91(6):1560-7.
3
A retrospective analysis of 3 year's experience of an interdisciplinary approach to gallstone disease including shock-waves.对采用包括冲击波在内的跨学科方法治疗胆结石疾病三年经验的回顾性分析。
Ann Surg. 1988 Sep;208(3):274-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198809000-00003.
4
Shock-wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. The first 175 patients.胆囊结石的冲击波碎石术。首批175例患者。
N Engl J Med. 1988 Feb 18;318(7):393-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198802183180701.
5
Piezo-ceramic lithotripsy of gallbladder stones: initial experience in 38 patients.
Lancet. 1988 Jun 11;1(8598):1322-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92130-7.
6
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and methyl tert-butyl ether for partially calcified gallstones.体外冲击波碎石术及甲基叔丁基醚治疗部分钙化胆结石
Gastroenterology. 1989 Nov;97(5):1229-35. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)91694-6.
7
Gallstone disappearance after extracorporeal lithotripsy and oral bile acid dissolution.
Gastroenterology. 1989 Aug;97(2):457-63. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90083-8.
8
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones. Possibilities and limitations.胆结石的体外冲击波碎石术。可能性与局限性。
Ann Surg. 1989 Nov;210(5):565-75. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198911000-00001.
9
Cholecystectomy: the gold standard.胆囊切除术:金标准。
Am J Surg. 1989 Sep;158(3):174-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90246-8.
10
Use of external shock-wave lithotripsy and adjuvant ursodiol for treatment of radiolucent gallstones. A national multicenter study.体外冲击波碎石术联合熊去氧胆酸治疗透X线胆囊结石:一项全国多中心研究
Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Jul;34(7):1011-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01536365.