Alzheimer Center, Methodist Neurological Institute, 6560 Fannin Street, Suite 802, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1213-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570077. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with vascular dementia (VaD) fulfilling National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria.
This international, multicenter, 24-week trial was conducted from March 2003 to August 2005. Patients (N=974; mean age, 73.0 years) with probable or possible VaD were randomized 2:1 to receive donepezil 5 mg/d or placebo. Coprimary outcome measures were scores on the Vascular-Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change, plus carer interview. Analyses were performed for the intent-to-treat population with the last-observation-carried-forward method.
Compared with placebo, donepezil-treated patients showed significant improvement from baseline to end point on the Vascular-Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (least-squares mean difference, -1.156; 95% CI, -1.98 to -0.33; P<0.01) but not on the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change, plus carer interview. Patients with hippocampal atrophy who were treated with donepezil demonstrated stable cognition versus a decline in the placebo-treated group; in those without atrophy, cognition improved with donepezil versus relative stability with placebo. Results on secondary efficacy measures were inconsistent. The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups. Eleven deaths occurred in the donepezil group (1.7%), similar to rates previously reported for donepezil trials in VaD, whereas no deaths occurred in the placebo group.
Patients treated with donepezil 5 mg/d demonstrated significant improvement in cognitive, but not global, function. Donepezil was relatively well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with current labeling. Mortality in the placebo group was unexpectedly low. The differential treatment response of VaD patients by hippocampal size suggests that hippocampal imaging warrants further investigation for understanding VaD.
我们旨在评估多奈哌齐在符合国立神经病学与卒中研究院-国际协会科研与教育委员会(NINDS-AIREN)血管性痴呆(VaD)诊断标准的 VaD 患者中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项国际性、多中心、24 周的试验,于 2003 年 3 月至 2005 年 8 月进行。患者(N=974;平均年龄 73.0 岁)分为 2:1 随机接受多奈哌齐 5mg/d 或安慰剂治疗。主要疗效指标为血管性阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表和临床医生基于访谈的变化印象,以及照顾者访谈的评分。采用最后观察值结转法进行意向治疗人群的分析。
与安慰剂相比,多奈哌齐治疗的患者在血管性阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表上从基线到终点的改善具有显著意义(最小二乘均数差值,-1.156;95%CI,-1.98 至-0.33;P<0.01),但在临床医生基于访谈的变化印象,以及照顾者访谈上没有显著差异。接受多奈哌齐治疗且存在海马萎缩的患者认知稳定,而安慰剂治疗组的患者认知下降;不存在海马萎缩的患者中,认知能力在多奈哌齐治疗组中得到改善,而在安慰剂治疗组中相对稳定。次要疗效指标的结果不一致。各组的不良事件发生率相似。多奈哌齐组有 11 例死亡(1.7%),与此前多奈哌齐治疗 VaD 的试验报告的发生率相似,而安慰剂组没有死亡。
多奈哌齐 5mg/d 治疗的患者认知功能,而非整体功能有显著改善。多奈哌齐相对耐受良好;不良事件与当前的标签一致。安慰剂组的死亡率出乎意料地低。海马大小对 VaD 患者治疗反应的差异表明,海马成像值得进一步研究,以了解 VaD。