Physiotherapy Department, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Spinal Cord. 2011 Jan;49(1):17-29. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.39. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
Systematic review.
Identify, evaluate, and synthesize evidence regarding the effectiveness of various treatment strategies for the respiratory management of acute tetraplegia.
Melbourne, Australia.
A search of multiple electronic databases (Medline, Cinahl, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, http://www.guideline.gov and http://www.icord.org/scire) was undertaken accompanied by the reference lists of all relevant articles identified. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the PEDro Scale. Descriptive analysis was performed.
Twenty-one studies including 1263 patients were identified. The majority of the studies were case series (n = 13). A variety of interventions were used for the management of respiratory complications. Mortality (ARR = 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18, 0.61), the incidence of respiratory complications (ARR = 0.36, 95% CI (0.08, 0.58)), and requirement for a tracheostomy (ARR = 0.18, 95% CI (-0.05, 0.4)) were significantly reduced by using a respiratory protocol. A clinical pathway reduced duration of mechanical ventilation by 6 days 95% CI (-0.56, 12.56), intensive care unit length of stay by 6.8 days 95% CI (0.17-13.77) and costs. Intubation, mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy are the mainstay of respiratory management for complete injuries above the level of C5.
This review showed a clinical pathway with a structured respiratory protocol that includes a combination of treatment techniques provided regularly is effective in reducing respiratory complications and cost. The overall study quality was moderate and further studies using specific interventions that target respiratory complications are associated with specific regions of the cervical spine using more methodologically rigorous designs are required.
系统评价。
确定、评估和综合各种治疗策略对急性四肢瘫痪患者呼吸管理的有效性证据。
澳大利亚墨尔本。
对多个电子数据库(Medline、Cinahl、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、http://www.guideline.gov 和 http://www.icord.org/scire)进行了检索,并查阅了所有相关文章的参考文献列表。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 PEDro 量表评估方法学质量。进行描述性分析。
确定了 21 项研究,包括 1263 名患者。大多数研究为病例系列(n=13)。使用了各种干预措施来管理呼吸并发症。死亡率(ARR=0.4,95%置信区间(CI)0.18,0.61)、呼吸并发症发生率(ARR=0.36,95%CI(0.08,0.58))和需要气管切开术(ARR=0.18,95%CI(-0.05,0.4))显著降低了使用呼吸协议。临床路径将机械通气时间缩短了 6 天(95%CI:-0.56,12.56)、缩短了重症监护病房的住院时间 6.8 天(95%CI:0.17,13.77)并降低了成本。对于 C5 以上完全损伤,插管、机械通气和气管切开术是呼吸管理的主要方法。
本综述表明,临床路径结合了结构化的呼吸方案,包括定期使用多种治疗技术,可有效减少呼吸并发症和成本。总体研究质量为中等,需要进一步研究使用针对特定颈椎区域的特定干预措施,采用更严格的设计方法,以降低与特定区域相关的呼吸并发症。