Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2010 Apr 14;132(14):144104. doi: 10.1063/1.3378024.
The S22 test set of interaction energies for small model complexes [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1985 (2006)] has been very valuable for benchmarking new and existing methods for noncovalent interactions. However, the basis sets utilized to compute the CCSD(T) interaction energies for some of the dimers are insufficient to obtain converged results. Here we consistently extrapolate all CCSD(T)/complete basis set (CBS) interaction energies using larger basis sets for the CCSD(T) component of the computation. The revised values, which we designate S22A, represent the most accurate results to date for this set of dimers. The new values appear to be within a few hundredths of 1 kcal mol(-1) of the true CCSD(T)/CBS limit at the given geometries, but the former S22 values are off by as much as 0.6 kcal mol(-1) compared to the revised values. Because some of the most promising methods for noncovalent interactions are already achieving this level of agreement (or better) compared to the S22 data, more accurate benchmark values would clearly be helpful. The MP2, SCS-MP2, SCS-CCSD, SCS(MI)-MP2, and B2PLYP-D methods have been tested against the more accurate benchmark set. The B2PLYP-D method outperforms all other methods tested here, with a mean average deviation of only 0.12 kcal mol(-1). However, the consistent, slight underestimation of the interaction energies computed by the SCS-CCSD method (an overall mean absolute deviation and mean deviation of 0.24 and -0.23 kcal mol(-1), respectively) suggests that the SCS-CCSD method has the potential to become even more accurate with a reoptimization of its parameters for noncovalent interactions.
S22 测试集的交互能小模型复合物[物理化学化学物理 8,1985(2006)]非常有价值的基准新的和现有的方法非共价相互作用。然而,利用一些二聚体计算 CCSD(T)相互作用能的基组不足以获得收敛的结果。在这里,我们一致地使用更大的基组来外推所有 CCSD(T)/完全基组(CBS)相互作用能,对于计算的 CCSD(T)部分。修订后的数值,我们指定 S22A,代表了这组二聚体迄今为止最准确的结果。新值似乎在给定的几何形状下,与 CCSD(T)/CBS 极限相差几个百分之几的 1 kcal mol(-1),但与修订后的数值相比,以前的 S22 值相差高达 0.6 kcal mol(-1)。由于一些最有前途的非共价相互作用方法已经达到了与 S22 数据相比的这种水平的一致性(或更好),更准确的基准值显然会有所帮助。MP2、SCS-MP2、SCS-CCSD、SCS(MI)-MP2 和 B2PLYP-D 方法已针对更准确的基准集进行了测试。B2PLYP-D 方法的性能优于这里测试的所有其他方法,平均平均偏差仅为 0.12 kcal mol(-1)。然而,SCS-CCSD 方法计算的相互作用能的一致、轻微低估(总平均绝对偏差和平均偏差分别为 0.24 和-0.23 kcal mol(-1))表明,SCS-CCSD 方法具有更大的潜力,通过重新优化其非共价相互作用的参数,使其变得更加准确。