• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厌食症、贪食症和肥胖症:在爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)上的共同决策缺陷。

Anorexia, bulimia, and obesity: shared decision making deficits on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).

机构信息

School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Jul;16(4):711-5. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000354. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1017/S1355617710000354
PMID:20406532
Abstract

The pathological eating behaviors in Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Bulimia Nervosa (BN), and obesity are characterized by a preference for high immediate reward, despite higher future losses in terms of both physical and psychological outcomes. The present study compared the decision making profile of females with a diagnosis of AN (n = 22), BN (n = 17), obesity (n = 18), and a healthy weight comparison group (n = 20) using a standardized neuropsychological test, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). The three clinical groups (AN, BN, obesity) were significantly impaired on the IGT compared with the comparison group on both overall task performance and task learning; however, the three clinical groups were not significantly different from each other. Sixty-one percent to 77% of the clinical groups reached the threshold for impairment on the IGT, compared with 15% of the comparison group. The potential basis for this shared decision making profile is discussed.

摘要

神经性厌食症(AN)、神经性贪食症(BN)和肥胖症的病理性进食行为的特征是偏好即时高奖励,尽管从身体和心理两个方面来看,未来的损失更高。本研究使用标准化神经心理学测试——爱荷华赌博任务(IGT),比较了 AN(n=22)、BN(n=17)、肥胖(n=18)和健康体重对照组(n=20)女性的决策制定特征。与对照组相比,三个临床组(AN、BN、肥胖)在整体任务表现和任务学习上均显著受损;然而,三个临床组彼此之间没有显著差异。临床组中 61%到 77%达到了 IGT 受损的阈值,而对照组中只有 15%。讨论了这种共享决策制定特征的潜在基础。

相似文献

1
Anorexia, bulimia, and obesity: shared decision making deficits on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).厌食症、贪食症和肥胖症:在爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)上的共同决策缺陷。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Jul;16(4):711-5. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000354. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
2
Neuropsychological correlates of decision making in patients with bulimia nervosa.神经性贪食症患者决策的神经心理学关联
Neuropsychology. 2007 Nov;21(6):742-50. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.6.742.
3
An investigation of decision making in anorexia nervosa using the Iowa Gambling Task and skin conductance measurements.一项使用爱荷华赌博任务和皮肤电导率测量对神经性厌食症决策制定的调查。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Jul;13(4):635-41. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707070798. Epub 2007 May 18.
4
Neuropsychological investigation of decision-making in anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症决策的神经心理学研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2004 Jul 15;127(3):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.03.012.
5
The Iowa gambling task as a measure of decision making in women with bulimia nervosa.爱荷华赌博任务作为神经性贪食症女性决策能力的一种测量方法。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Sep;12(5):741-5. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060887.
6
Differential impairments underlying decision making in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: a cognitive modeling analysis.神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症决策制定中潜在的差异损害:认知建模分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Mar;47(2):157-67. doi: 10.1002/eat.22223. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
Dissociation of emotional decision-making from cognitive decision-making in chronic schizophrenia.慢性精神分裂症中情绪决策与认知决策的分离
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Aug 30;152(2-3):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.02.001. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
8
An examination of decision making in bulimia nervosa.神经性贪食症中的决策研究
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 May;31(4):455-61. doi: 10.1080/13803390802251378.
9
Immediate pleasures and future consequences. A neuropsychological study of binge eating and obesity.即时满足与未来后果。暴食和肥胖的神经心理学研究。
Appetite. 2010 Feb;54(1):208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
10
Delayed transition from ambiguous to risky decision making in alcohol dependence during Iowa Gambling Task.酒精依赖者在进行 Iowa 赌博任务时,从不确定决策向风险决策的转变延迟。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Dec 30;190(2-3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Interoceptive accuracy is associated with benefits in decision making in children.内感受准确性与儿童决策中的益处相关。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1070037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1070037. eCollection 2022.
2
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
3
Is decision-making impairment an endophenotype of anorexia nervosa?决策障碍是否是厌食症的一种内表型?
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 21;65(1):e68. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2327.
4
Gender and Emotional Representation Matter: Own Illness Beliefs and Their Relationship to Obesity.性别与情绪表征至关重要:自身疾病信念及其与肥胖的关系。
Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 8;9:799831. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.799831. eCollection 2022.
5
Decision-Making, Impulsiveness and Temperamental Traits in Eating Disorders.饮食失调中的决策、冲动性和气质特征。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Aug;17(4):199-208. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200401.
6
Satiety does not alter the ventral striatum's response to immediate reward in bulimia nervosa.饱足感不会改变神经性贪食症患者腹侧纹状体对即时奖励的反应。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Nov;130(8):862-874. doi: 10.1037/abn0000712.
7
Obese Subjects without Eating Disorders Experience Binge Episodes Also Independently of Emotional Eating and Personality Traits among University Students of Southern Italy.在意大利南部大学生中,没有饮食失调的肥胖受试者也会出现暴饮暴食现象,且这一现象与情绪化进食和人格特质无关。
Brain Sci. 2021 Aug 29;11(9):1145. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091145.
8
The Role of Negative Affect in Emotional Processing of Food-Related Images in Eating Disorders and Obesity.消极情绪在饮食失调和肥胖症中对食物相关图像的情绪加工中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 23;12:723732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723732. eCollection 2021.
9
Relationship between BMI and alcohol consumption levels in decision making.BMI 与决策中的饮酒水平之间的关系。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Nov;45(11):2455-2463. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00919-x. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
10
Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.非典型内感受作为精神病理学的一个共同风险因素:综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:470-508. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.036. Epub 2021 Aug 3.