Coane Jennifer H, McBride Dawn M
Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790-4620, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1026-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03193249.
In the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, studying lists of semantic associates results in high rates of false recognition of a nonpresented critical word. The present set of experiments was designed to measure the contribution of additional processing of list items at test to this false memory effect. The participants studied sets of lists and then performed a recognition task for each set. In three experiments, using this paradigm, we investigated false recognition when the number of studied list items presented at test (0, 6, or 12) was manipulated. In Experiments 2 and 3, false recognition of critical lures associated to both studied and nonstudied lists increased significantly as the number of list items included in the test increased. These results indicate that processes occurring at retrieval contribute to false memory effects found with the DRM paradigm.
在迪斯/罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)范式中,研究语义关联列表会导致对未呈现的关键单词产生较高的错误识别率。本系列实验旨在测量测试时对列表项目的额外加工对这种错误记忆效应的影响。参与者学习多组列表,然后对每组列表进行识别任务。在三个实验中,采用该范式,我们研究了测试时呈现的已学列表项目数量(0、6或12个)被操纵时的错误识别情况。在实验2和实验3中,与已学和未学列表相关的关键诱饵的错误识别随着测试中包含的列表项目数量的增加而显著增加。这些结果表明,检索时发生的过程会导致DRM范式中出现的错误记忆效应。