Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Soc Work. 2010 Apr;55(2):157-67. doi: 10.1093/sw/55.2.157.
Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are legal documents that allow individuals to express their wishes for future psychiatric care and to authorize a legally appointed proxy to make decisions on their behalf during incapacitating crises. PADs are viewed as an alternative to the coercive interventions that sometimes accompany mental health crises for people with mental illness. Insofar as coercive interventions can abridge clients' autonomy and self-determination--values supported by the NASW Code of Ethics--social workers have a vested interest in finding ways to reduce coercion and increase autonomy and self-determination in their practice. However, PADs are also viewed as having the potential to positively affect a variety of other clinical outcomes, including, but not limited to, treatment engagement, treatment satisfaction, and working alliance. This article reviews the clinical and legal history of PADs and empirical evidence for their implementation and effectiveness. Despite what should be an inherent interest in PADs and the fact that laws authorizing PADs have proliferated in the past decade, there is little theoretical or empirical research on PADS in the social work literature.
精神科预先指示(PAD)是法律文件,允许个人表达对未来精神科护理的意愿,并授权合法指定的代理人在丧失能力的危机期间代表他们做出决定。PAD 被视为精神疾病患者精神健康危机时伴随的强制性干预的替代方法。由于强制性干预可能会限制客户的自主权和自决权——这是 NASW 伦理准则所支持的价值观——因此,社会工作者有兴趣寻找减少强制干预和增加自主权和自决权的方法。然而,PAD 也被认为有可能对各种其他临床结果产生积极影响,包括但不限于治疗参与、治疗满意度和工作联盟。本文回顾了 PAD 的临床和法律历史,以及关于其实施和有效性的经验证据。尽管 PAD 应该引起内在的兴趣,而且授权 PAD 的法律在过去十年中大量增加,但在社会工作文献中,关于 PADS 的理论或实证研究很少。