• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲国家与菲律宾城市人口的癌症存活率差异。

Cancer survival differences between European countries and an urban population from the Philippines.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2011 Apr;21(2):221-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq031. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckq031
PMID:20410159
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The EUROCARE study has disclosed large variations of survival across Europe, with the magnitude varying, depending on cancer site. Comparisons of these rates with those from the developing countries are rare, but important in evaluating international cancer care discrepancies. This study aimed to provide up-to-date estimates of cancer survival in a Philippine urban population, and to compare these with those observed in the European countries.

METHODS

Using the results from the EUROCARE-4 study, the survival estimates of the European patients who were diagnosed in 1995-99 and followed till December 2003 were abstracted. From randomly selected samples drawn from the Manila and Rizal Cancer Registries, 5-year survival was estimated for nine common cancers. Age-adjusted survival estimates were then compared between the Philippine population and Europeans.

RESULTS

In comparison to the European mean, survival estimates for the Philippine residents were lower for most cancers, with differences ranging from 2 to 40% units. Differences with European country-specific estimates were large for cancers of the breast and cervix, where early detection is possible, and for leukaemia, where treatment regimens are costly, highlighting the importance of health care. Smaller discrepancies were observed for stomach, liver and lung cancers, with the 5-year relative survival being similar to the Philippines and to many European countries. A survival advantage was seen though for the Philippine residents for ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

Apart from efforts to prevent cancers, improvements in cancer control and making early diagnosis and treatment more accessible remain major challenges, both in the Philippines and in the European nations.

摘要

背景

EUROCARE 研究揭示了欧洲各地生存率的巨大差异,其幅度因癌症部位而异。与发展中国家的这些比率进行比较很少见,但对于评估国际癌症护理差异很重要。本研究旨在提供菲律宾城市人口癌症生存的最新估计,并将这些估计与欧洲国家观察到的结果进行比较。

方法

利用 EUROCARE-4 研究的结果,提取了 1995-99 年诊断并随访至 2003 年 12 月的欧洲患者的生存估计值。从马尼拉和黎刹癌症登记处随机抽取样本,估计了 9 种常见癌症的 5 年生存率。然后比较菲律宾人群和欧洲人的年龄调整后生存率估计值。

结果

与欧洲平均水平相比,菲律宾居民的大多数癌症的生存率估计值较低,差异范围为 2%至 40%。与欧洲特定国家的估计值差异较大的癌症包括乳腺癌和宫颈癌,这些癌症可以早期发现,以及白血病,这些癌症的治疗方案昂贵,突出了医疗保健的重要性。对于胃癌、肝癌和肺癌,差异较小,5 年相对生存率与菲律宾和许多欧洲国家相似。然而,菲律宾居民的卵巢癌生存率存在优势。

结论

除了预防癌症的努力外,改善癌症控制并使早期诊断和治疗更容易获得仍然是菲律宾和欧洲国家面临的主要挑战。

相似文献

1
Cancer survival differences between European countries and an urban population from the Philippines.欧洲国家与菲律宾城市人口的癌症存活率差异。
Eur J Public Health. 2011 Apr;21(2):221-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq031. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
2
Survival for cancer patients in Europe.欧洲癌症患者的生存率。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2009;45(3):315-24.
3
Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study.1995 - 1999年确诊的欧洲成年患者中八大主要癌症及所有癌症合并的生存率:EUROCARE - 4研究结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Sep;8(9):773-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70245-0.
4
Cancer survival discrepancies in developed and developing countries: comparisons between the Philippines and the United States.发达国家与发展中国家的癌症生存率差异:菲律宾与美国的比较。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Mar 10;100(5):858-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604945. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
5
Toward a comparison of survival in American and European cancer patients.迈向美国与欧洲癌症患者生存率的比较。
Cancer. 2000 Aug 15;89(4):893-900.
6
The cure of cancer: a European perspective.癌症的治疗:欧洲视角
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Apr;45(6):1067-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.034. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
7
Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995-2002.1995年至2002年期间被诊断患有癌症的欧洲儿童和青年的生存率。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Apr;45(6):992-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.042. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
8
EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995-1999. Results and commentary.欧洲癌症患者护理与评估研究(EUROCARE)-4。1995 - 1999年确诊的癌症患者生存率。结果与评论。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Apr;45(6):931-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.018. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
9
Cancer incidence and survival in Metro Manila and Rizal province, Philippines.菲律宾马尼拉都会区和黎刹省的癌症发病率和生存率。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul;40(7):603-12. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq034. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
10
Cancer survival in Manila, Philippines, 1994-1995.1994 - 1995年菲律宾马尼拉的癌症生存率
IARC Sci Publ. 2011(162):147-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival differences between the USA and an urban population from China for all cancer types and 20 individual cancers: a population-based study.美国与中国城市人口在所有癌症类型及20种特定癌症方面的生存差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 May 23;37:100799. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100799. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Global pattern and trends of colorectal cancer survival: a systematic review of population-based registration data.结直肠癌生存的全球模式与趋势:基于人群登记数据的系统综述
Cancer Biol Med. 2021 Sep 6;19(2):175-86. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0634.
3
The survival rate of hepatocellular carcinoma in Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
亚洲国家肝细胞癌的生存率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
EXCLI J. 2020 Jan 13;19:108-130. doi: 10.17179/excli2019-1842. eCollection 2020.
4
Cancer survival in Qidong between 1972 and 2011: A population-based analysis.1972年至2011年启东市的癌症生存率:基于人群的分析。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;6(6):944-954. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1234. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Survival of Cancer Patients in Northeast China: Analysis of Sampled Cancers from Population-Based Cancer Registries.中国东北地区癌症患者的生存状况:基于人群癌症登记处抽样癌症的分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;49(4):1106-1113. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.613. Epub 2017 Feb 2.