Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Chemosphere. 2010 Jun;80(3):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.052. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
This paper evaluates the performance of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) in separating and concentrating aqueous fullerene (nC(60)) from wastewater and compares UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry for the quantification of C(60). LLE was suitable for multiple wastewater matrices, while SPE required filtration or reclaimed wastewater and secondary effluent of less suspended solids. Calibration curves plotted as peak areas of UV absorbance at 332 nm against spiked nC(60) concentrations showed good linearity over a range of 20-200 microg L(-1) after 10-fold concentration by LLE, but only over the range of 0.8-2 microg L(-1) for reclaimed wastewater and 0.8-4 microg L(-1) for secondary effluent after 1000-fold concentration by SPE. Recoveries of nC(60) by LLE were in the range of 89-94% with a standard deviation (SD) not more than 2% and recoveries of nC(60) by SPE were much lower, only 18% for reclaimed wastewater and 9% for secondary effluent. The method detection limits (MDLs) of LLE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 3-4 microg L(-1) for six water matrices and the MDLs of SPE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 0.42 microg L(-1) for reclaimed wastewater and 0.64 microg L(-1) for secondary effluent. UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry gave similar sensitivity. With LLE, mass spectrometry offered a small linear range of 20-60 microg L(-1), but it provided specificity based on the mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of the molecular ions. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of different extraction and detection methods to quantify nC(60) in engineered wastewater matrices.
本文评价了液-液萃取(LLE)和固相萃取(SPE)在从废水中分离和浓缩水溶富勒烯(nC(60))方面的性能,并比较了紫外可见光谱法和质谱法用于定量 C(60)的方法。LLE 适用于多种废水基质,而 SPE 需要过滤或回收废水和悬浮固体较少的二级出水。用 LLE 浓缩 10 倍后,以 332nm 处紫外吸光度的峰面积对 nC(60)浓度进行标准曲线绘制,在 20-200μg L(-1)范围内具有良好的线性关系,但对于回收废水和二级出水,仅在 0.8-2μg L(-1)和 0.8-4μg L(-1)范围内具有良好的线性关系。LLE 法回收 nC(60)的回收率在 89-94%之间,标准偏差(SD)不超过 2%,SPE 法回收 nC(60)的回收率则低得多,仅为回收废水的 18%和二级出水的 9%。LLE 结合紫外可见光谱法的方法检测限(MDLs)为 6 种水基质的 3-4μg L(-1),SPE 结合紫外可见光谱法的 MDLs 为回收废水的 0.42μg L(-1)和二级出水的 0.64μg L(-1)。紫外可见光谱法和质谱法的灵敏度相似。LLE 法的质谱法线性范围较小,为 20-60μg L(-1),但它基于分子离子的质荷比(m/z)提供了特异性。本文证明了不同萃取和检测方法相结合定量工程废水中 nC(60)的可行性。