Suppr超能文献

Seeplex VRE检测试剂盒与ChromID VRE琼脂用于检测直肠拭子标本中耐万古霉素肠球菌的比较。

Comparison of Seeplex VRE detection kit with ChromID VRE agar for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in rectal swab specimens.

作者信息

Lee So-Young, Park Kang Gyun, Lee Gun Dong, Park Jung Jun, Park Yeon-Joon

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-ku, Seoul 137-701, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2010 Spring;40(2):163-6.

Abstract

The performance of the recently developed Seeplex VRE detection kit was compared with chromID VRE agar and the conventional blood agar plate with vancomycin disk (BAP-VA) for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from 180 rectal swab specimens. After 18 hr enrichment in enterococcosel broth (EB), the sensitivity and specificity for detection of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were as follows: Seeplex VRE detection kit, 92.5% and 98.9%; chromID VRE agar, 92.5% and 97.8%; BAP-VA, 77.5% and 70.3%, respectively. The reporting times averaged 2, 3.4, and 3.6 days, respectively. The Seeplex VRE detection kit and chromID VRE agar were comparable and were superior to BAP-VA. Unexpectedly, 15.7% of VRE were vanA-positive Enterococcus species other than E. faecium and E. faecalis. Vigilance is suggested to see if these species eventually emerge as significant pathogens.

摘要

将最近开发的Seeplex VRE检测试剂盒的性能与chromID VRE琼脂以及含万古霉素纸片的传统血琼脂平板(BAP-VA)进行比较,以检测180份直肠拭子标本中的耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)。在肠球菌肉汤(EB)中富集18小时后,检测耐万古霉素屎肠球菌的灵敏度和特异性如下:Seeplex VRE检测试剂盒分别为92.5%和98.9%;chromID VRE琼脂分别为92.5%和97.8%;BAP-VA分别为77.5%和70.3%。报告时间平均分别为2天、3.4天和3.6天。Seeplex VRE检测试剂盒和chromID VRE琼脂相当,且优于BAP-VA。出乎意料的是,15.7%的VRE是除屎肠球菌和粪肠球菌之外的vanA阳性肠球菌属物种。建议保持警惕,观察这些物种最终是否会成为重要病原体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验