Lee So-Young, Park Kang Gyun, Lee Gun Dong, Park Jung Jun, Park Yeon-Joon
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-ku, Seoul 137-701, Korea.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2010 Spring;40(2):163-6.
The performance of the recently developed Seeplex VRE detection kit was compared with chromID VRE agar and the conventional blood agar plate with vancomycin disk (BAP-VA) for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from 180 rectal swab specimens. After 18 hr enrichment in enterococcosel broth (EB), the sensitivity and specificity for detection of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium were as follows: Seeplex VRE detection kit, 92.5% and 98.9%; chromID VRE agar, 92.5% and 97.8%; BAP-VA, 77.5% and 70.3%, respectively. The reporting times averaged 2, 3.4, and 3.6 days, respectively. The Seeplex VRE detection kit and chromID VRE agar were comparable and were superior to BAP-VA. Unexpectedly, 15.7% of VRE were vanA-positive Enterococcus species other than E. faecium and E. faecalis. Vigilance is suggested to see if these species eventually emerge as significant pathogens.
将最近开发的Seeplex VRE检测试剂盒的性能与chromID VRE琼脂以及含万古霉素纸片的传统血琼脂平板(BAP-VA)进行比较,以检测180份直肠拭子标本中的耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)。在肠球菌肉汤(EB)中富集18小时后,检测耐万古霉素屎肠球菌的灵敏度和特异性如下:Seeplex VRE检测试剂盒分别为92.5%和98.9%;chromID VRE琼脂分别为92.5%和97.8%;BAP-VA分别为77.5%和70.3%。报告时间平均分别为2天、3.4天和3.6天。Seeplex VRE检测试剂盒和chromID VRE琼脂相当,且优于BAP-VA。出乎意料的是,15.7%的VRE是除屎肠球菌和粪肠球菌之外的vanA阳性肠球菌属物种。建议保持警惕,观察这些物种最终是否会成为重要病原体。