Suppr超能文献

在工作记忆任务期间进行同时的 EEG-fMRI:低频和高频带的调制。

Simultaneous EEG-fMRI during a working memory task: modulations in low and high frequency bands.

机构信息

Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Apr 22;5(4):e10298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010298.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

EEG studies of working memory (WM) have demonstrated load dependent frequency band modulations. FMRI studies have localized load modulated activity to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Recently, an EEG-fMRI study found that low frequency band (theta and alpha) activity negatively correlated with the BOLD signal during the retention phase of a WM task. However, the coupling of higher (beta and gamma) frequencies with the BOLD signal during WM is unknown.

METHODOLOGY

In 16 healthy adult subjects, we first investigated EEG-BOLD signal correlations for theta (5-7 Hz), alpha1 (8-10), alpha2 (10-12 Hz), beta1 (13-20), beta2 (20-30 Hz), and gamma (30-40 Hz) during the retention period of a WM task with set size 2 and 5. Secondly, we investigated whether load sensitive brain regions are characterised by effects that relate frequency bands to BOLD signals effects.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We found negative theta-BOLD signal correlations in the MPFC, PPC, and cingulate cortex (ACC and PCC). For alpha1 positive correlations with the BOLD signal were found in ACC, MPFC, and PCC; negative correlations were observed in DLPFC, PPC, and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Negative alpha2-BOLD signal correlations were observed in parieto-occipital regions. Beta1-BOLD signal correlations were positive in ACC and negative in precentral and superior temporal gyrus. Beta2 and gamma showed only positive correlations with BOLD, e.g., in DLPFC, MPFC (gamma) and IFG (beta2/gamma). The load analysis revealed that theta and--with one exception--beta and gamma demonstrated exclusively positive load effects, while alpha1 showed only negative effects.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the directions of EEG-BOLD signal correlations vary across brain regions and EEG frequency bands. In addition, some brain regions show both load sensitive BOLD and frequency band effects. Our data indicate that lower as well as higher frequency brain oscillations are linked to neurovascular processes during WM.

摘要

背景

工作记忆(WM)的脑电图研究表明,频段调制依赖于负荷。功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究将负荷调制的活动定位于背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)、内侧前额叶皮层(MPFC)和后顶叶皮层(PPC)。最近,一项脑电图-功能磁共振成像(EEG-fMRI)研究发现,在 WM 任务的保持阶段,低频带(θ和α)活动与 BOLD 信号呈负相关。然而,WM 期间高频带(β和γ)与 BOLD 信号的耦合尚不清楚。

方法

在 16 名健康成年受试者中,我们首先研究了在 WM 任务的保持期(set size 2 和 5)中θ(5-7 Hz)、α1(8-10)、α2(10-12 Hz)、β1(13-20)、β2(20-30)和γ(30-40 Hz)的 EEG-BOLD 信号相关性。其次,我们研究了负荷敏感脑区是否以与频率带相关的 BOLD 信号效应为特征。

主要发现

我们在 MPFC、PPC 和扣带回(ACC 和 PCC)中发现了θ-BOLD 信号的负相关。在 ACC、MPFC 和 PCC 中观察到α1 与 BOLD 信号的正相关;在 DLPFC、PPC 和下额前回(IFG)中观察到负相关。在顶枕叶区域观察到α2-BOLD 信号的负相关。β1-BOLD 信号在 ACC 中为正相关,在中央前回和颞上回中为负相关。β2 和γ仅与 BOLD 呈正相关,例如在 DLPFC、MPFC(γ)和 IFG(β2/γ)中。负荷分析表明,θ和——除一个例外——β和γ仅表现出阳性负荷效应,而α1 仅表现出阴性效应。

结论

我们的结论是,EEG-BOLD 信号相关性的方向在脑区和 EEG 频段之间存在差异。此外,一些脑区显示出负荷敏感的 BOLD 和频段效应。我们的数据表明,在 WM 过程中,较低和较高的脑振荡频率都与神经血管过程有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61e1/2858659/2dddc85f2ad7/pone.0010298.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验