Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2842-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1060-8. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
Endoscopic resection is widely accepted as the primary treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis. A new and refined technique, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), may prove to be more effective; however, incomplete resection and local recurrence present ongoing concerns. We sought to determine the clinicopathological features associated with local recurrence in patients with EGC following endoscopic resection.
We enrolled in this study 239 EGC patients treated by endoscopic resection between January 2002 and January 2008.
Fifty EGC lesions were treated by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR group) and 189 EGC lesions were treated by ESD (ESD group). During the follow-up period (mean = 30.3 months), the rates for en bloc resection and complete resection (defined as en bloc resection with negative resection margin) were 64% (32/50) and 60% (30/50), respectively, in the EMR group, and 86.8% (164/189) and 79.9% (151/189), respectively, in the ESD group. We observed seven local recurrences in the ESD group, though only one with complete resection by ESD had a local recurrence. The EMR group showed a significantly higher recurrence rate than did the ESD group (18% vs. 3.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Incomplete resection significantly increased local recurrence risk, and larger tumor size and use of EMR increased the risk for incomplete resection. Most lesions (3/4) treated with additional argon plasma coagulation for an initial recurrence had recurred again.
Despite the potential advantages in treating EGC with ESD, a risk for local recurrence remains. All patients treated with EMR, even with curative resection, and those with incomplete resection after ESD require conscientious surveillance for local recurrence. Furthermore, a large prospective study will be required to determine the best treatment modality for local recurrence.
内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)已广泛用于无淋巴结转移的早期胃癌(EGC)的治疗。一种新的、精细化的技术——内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)可能更有效,但仍存在不完全切除和局部复发的问题。本研究旨在确定内镜切除后 EGC 患者局部复发的临床病理特征。
我们纳入了 2002 年 1 月至 2008 年 1 月间接受内镜治疗的 239 例 EGC 患者。
50 例 EGC 病变采用常规 EMR(EMR 组)治疗,189 例 EGC 病变采用 ESD(ESD 组)治疗。在随访期间(平均 30.3 个月),EMR 组整块切除率和完全切除率(定义为整块切除且切缘阴性)分别为 64%(32/50)和 60%(30/50),ESD 组分别为 86.8%(164/189)和 79.9%(151/189)。ESD 组中有 7 例局部复发,其中仅 1 例再次接受 ESD 治疗的患者局部复发。EMR 组的复发率显著高于 ESD 组(分别为 18%和 3.7%,p<0.001)。不完全切除显著增加局部复发风险,肿瘤较大和采用 EMR 增加了不完全切除的风险。最初复发后采用氩等离子凝固术治疗的 4 例病变中的 3 例再次复发。
尽管 ESD 治疗 EGC 具有潜在优势,但仍存在局部复发的风险。所有接受 EMR 治疗的患者,即使是根治性切除,以及 ESD 后不完全切除的患者,均需密切监测局部复发情况。此外,还需要进行大规模前瞻性研究以确定局部复发的最佳治疗方式。