Milsom W K
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Annu Rev Physiol. 1991;53:87-105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.53.030191.000511.
The respiratory control system of animals exhibiting intermittent breathing patterns allows significant fluctuations in all respiratory variables. The extent of these fluctuations can be quite large, particularly in those species with episodic breathing patterns. In these animals, blood gases and pH seem to be regulated within a homeostatic range. Pattern generation in these animals would seem, therefore, to be less dependent on a central rhythm generator and more closely dependent on inputs from peripheral receptor systems and higher brain stem centers. The evidence does suggest, however, that the medulla is the important region for central nervous system coordination of ventilation in these animals just as it is in rhythmic breathers. Peripheral input from mechanoreceptors associated with the lungs and chemoreceptors associated with the lungs and/or arterial blood appear important in regulating (a) the tidal volume of each breath, (b) the length of the ventilatory period, and (c) the length of the ventilatory pause. One of the more important conclusions that can be drawn from the data is that all three variables appear to be under separate control. The relative roles of the various receptor groups in the control of each respiratory variable remain unclear. Given the intermittent nature of the breathing, broad oscillations occur in the PO2, and to a lesser extent, PCO2 in lungs, blood, and presumably tissues, with accompanying pH fluctuations in body fluids. Although the functional significance of the two distinct ventilatory patterns seen in these animals remains unclear, the fact that the episodic breathing pattern can be converted to a single breath pattern experimentally, suggests that both patterns are manifestations of a common underlying control system. The data suggest that the episodic breathing pattern arises from a single breath pattern as a consequence of vagally modulated input from supramedullary centers in the brain. The similarities between the data collected from all vertebrates is striking. These similarities suggest that a common mechanism may underlie the various intermittent breathing patterns seen under physiologic conditions in all vertebrates. The conversion of continuous breathing to intermittent breathing in some fish in normoxic or hyperoxic water, as well as in squirrels entering hibernation, further suggests that both continuous and intermittent breathing are manifestations of a common control system. Although it is still too early to do more than speculate, the possibility exists that intermittent breathing may be the consequence of a reduced metabolic rate (the one factor ectotherms and hibernating and sleeping endotherms have in common) such that animals no longer need to breath continuously to meet metabolic demands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
表现出间歇性呼吸模式的动物的呼吸控制系统允许所有呼吸变量出现显著波动。这些波动的程度可能相当大,尤其是在那些具有间歇性呼吸模式的物种中。在这些动物中,血气和pH值似乎在稳态范围内受到调节。因此,这些动物的模式生成似乎较少依赖于中枢节律发生器,而更紧密地依赖于外周受体系统和高级脑干中枢的输入。然而,证据确实表明,延髓是这些动物中枢神经系统协调通气的重要区域,就像在有节律呼吸的动物中一样重要。来自与肺相关的机械感受器以及与肺和/或动脉血相关的化学感受器的外周输入,在调节(a)每次呼吸的潮气量、(b)通气期的长度以及(c)通气暂停的长度方面似乎很重要。从这些数据中可以得出的一个更重要的结论是,这三个变量似乎都受到独立控制。各种受体组在控制每个呼吸变量中的相对作用仍不清楚。鉴于呼吸的间歇性,PO2会出现广泛波动,并在较小程度上在肺、血液以及可能的组织中的PCO2也会波动,同时体液中的pH值也会随之波动。虽然在这些动物中看到的两种不同通气模式的功能意义仍不清楚,但间歇性呼吸模式可以通过实验转化为单次呼吸模式这一事实表明,这两种模式都是一个共同潜在控制系统的表现。数据表明,间歇性呼吸模式是由单次呼吸模式产生的,这是由于大脑中髓上中枢的迷走神经调节输入所致。从所有脊椎动物收集的数据之间的相似性很显著。这些相似性表明,一种共同机制可能是所有脊椎动物在生理条件下出现的各种间歇性呼吸模式的基础。一些鱼类在常氧或高氧水中从持续呼吸转变为间歇性呼吸,以及松鼠进入冬眠时也是如此,这进一步表明持续呼吸和间歇性呼吸都是一个共同控制系统的表现形式。虽然现在进行推测还为时过早,但间歇性呼吸可能是代谢率降低的结果(这是变温动物以及冬眠和睡眠中的恒温动物共有的一个因素)这种可能性是存在的,这样动物就不再需要持续呼吸来满足代谢需求。(摘要截取自400字)