• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度至中度哮喘中低剂量昔萘酸沙美特罗与丙酸氟替卡松的 24 周比较。

A 24-week comparison of low-dose ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in mild to moderate asthma.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases & Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogada 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2010 Aug;104(8):1121-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.03.032. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.03.032
PMID:20430601
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ciclesonide (80 microg/day) with fluticasone propionate (200 microg/day) in mild to moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

Patients aged 12-75 years and previously treated with low doses of inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate 250 microg/day or equivalent) entered a 2-4 week run-in period during which only rescue medication was permitted. For inclusion into the double-blind, 24-week treatment period, patients had to show a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) of 61-90% predicted and a decrease in FEV(1) during run-in of >or=10%. Patients (n = 480) were randomized to ciclesonide 80 microg (ex-actuator) once daily in the evening or fluticasone propionate 100 microg (ex-valve) twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in FEV(1). Secondary efficacy variables included asthma control and asthma-specific quality of life.

RESULTS

Both treatments significantly increased FEV(1) and other lung function variables from baseline (p < 0.0001, both groups, all variables). The least squares mean increases in FEV(1) were 0.46L (ciclesonide) and 0.52L (fluticasone propionate); non-inferiority of ciclesonide to fluticasone propionate was demonstrated (p = 0.0002, per-protocol analysis). Five patients in each group experienced asthma exacerbations. Improvements in the percent of days with asthma control (days with no asthma symptoms and no use of rescue medication) and asthma-specific quality of life were comparable between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed similar efficacy of ciclesonide 80 microg once daily and fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily in mild to moderate persistent asthma. The low dose of ciclesonide was efficacious during long-term treatment. EudraCT number: 2004-001072-39.

摘要

目的

比较环索奈德(80μg/天)与丙酸氟替卡松(200μg/天)在轻中度持续性哮喘中的疗效。

方法

年龄在 12-75 岁之间,先前接受低剂量吸入皮质类固醇(丙酸氟替卡松 250μg/天或等效剂量)治疗的患者进入为期 2-4 周的导入期,在此期间仅允许使用急救药物。要纳入双盲、24 周治疗期,患者必须表现出用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV1)占预计值的 61-90%,并且在导入期内 FEV1 下降≥10%。患者(n=480)随机分为环索奈德 80μg(原药)每天晚上一次或丙酸氟替卡松 100μg(原药)每天两次。主要疗效变量是从基线开始的 FEV1 变化。次要疗效变量包括哮喘控制和哮喘特异性生活质量。

结果

两种治疗方法均能显著增加 FEV1 和其他肺功能指标(p<0.0001,两组,所有变量)。FEV1 的最小二乘均值增加量分别为 0.46L(环索奈德)和 0.52L(丙酸氟替卡松);环索奈德与丙酸氟替卡松的非劣效性得到证实(p=0.0002,按方案分析)。每组各有 5 例患者发生哮喘加重。两组之间,哮喘控制天数(无哮喘症状和无使用急救药物的天数)和哮喘特异性生活质量的改善情况相当。

结论

该研究证实,环索奈德 80μg 每天一次和丙酸氟替卡松 100μg 每天两次在轻中度持续性哮喘中疗效相似。环索奈德的低剂量在长期治疗中有效。EudraCT 编号:2004-001072-39。

相似文献

1
A 24-week comparison of low-dose ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in mild to moderate asthma.轻度至中度哮喘中低剂量昔萘酸沙美特罗与丙酸氟替卡松的 24 周比较。
Respir Med. 2010 Aug;104(8):1121-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.03.032. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
2
A randomized study comparing ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma.一项比较环索奈德和丙酸氟替卡松治疗中度持续性哮喘患者的随机研究。
Respir Med. 2007 Aug;101(8):1677-86. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
3
Comparison of twice-daily inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.中度至重度持续性哮喘患者每日两次吸入环索奈德与丙酸氟替卡松的比较。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008;21(2):264-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 May 21.
4
Efficacy and safety of ciclesonide once daily and fluticasone propionate twice daily in children with asthma.环索奈德每日一次与丙酸氟替卡松每日两次治疗儿童哮喘的疗效与安全性。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jun;22(3):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.12.013. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
5
A comparative study of inhaled ciclesonide 160 microg/day and fluticasone propionate 176 microg/day in children with asthma.吸入用环索奈德160微克/天与丙酸氟替卡松176微克/天治疗儿童哮喘的对比研究
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Oct;41(10):954-61. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20474.
6
Comparable efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in asthma.环索奈德每日一次与丙酸氟替卡松每日两次治疗哮喘的疗效相当。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2006;19(6):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
7
Effects of hydrofluoroalkane formulations of ciclesonide 400 microg once daily vs fluticasone 250 microg twice daily on methacholine hyper-responsiveness in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.环索奈德400微克每日一次与氟替卡松250微克每日两次的氢氟烷制剂对轻至中度持续性哮喘患者乙酰甲胆碱高反应性的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jul;58(1):26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02108.x.
8
Randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide and budesonide in adolescents with severe asthma.环索奈德与布地奈德治疗重度哮喘青少年的疗效与安全性随机对照研究
Respir Med. 2007 Oct;101(10):2182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
9
Similar efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in patients with persistent asthma.在持续性哮喘患者中,环索奈德每日一次与丙酸氟替卡松每日两次的疗效相似。
J Asthma. 2007 Sep;44(7):555-63. doi: 10.1080/02770900701537081.
10
Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.吸入沙美特罗和氟替卡松:一项比较哮喘单一疗法与联合疗法的研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Mar;82(3):257-65. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62606-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Low-Dose Ketamine in Treating Acute Asthma Attack; a Randomized Clinical Trial.小剂量氯胺酮治疗急性哮喘发作的效果;一项随机临床试验。
Emerg (Tehran). 2018;6(1):e21. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
An evaluation of exact matching and propensity score methods as applied in a comparative effectiveness study of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.吸入性糖皮质激素治疗哮喘的比较效果研究中应用的精确匹配和倾向评分方法的评估。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2017 Mar 22;8:15-30. doi: 10.2147/POR.S122563. eCollection 2017.
3
Effect of inhaled corticosteroid particle size on asthma efficacy and safety outcomes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
吸入性糖皮质激素颗粒大小对哮喘疗效和安全性结局的影响:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0348-4.
4
Asthma-Related Outcomes in Patients Initiating Extrafine Ciclesonide or Fine-Particle Inhaled Corticosteroids.开始使用超细环索奈德或细颗粒吸入性糖皮质激素的患者的哮喘相关转归
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2017 Mar;9(2):116-125. doi: 10.4168/aair.2017.9.2.116.
5
Small airways dysfunction in asthma: evaluation and management to improve asthma control.哮喘的小气道功能障碍:评估和管理以改善哮喘控制。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2014 Sep;6(5):376-88. doi: 10.4168/aair.2014.6.5.376. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
6
Once-daily fluticasone furoate 50 mcg in mild-to-moderate asthma: a 24-week placebo-controlled randomized trial.每日一次50微克糠酸氟替卡松治疗轻至中度哮喘:一项为期24周的安慰剂对照随机试验。
Allergy. 2014 Nov;69(11):1522-30. doi: 10.1111/all.12480. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
7
Ciclesonide versus other inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in children.环索奈德与其他吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童慢性哮喘的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD010352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010352.