Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 May 1;181(9):1003-11. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200902-0281ST.
One in three Americans under 65 years of age does not have health insurance during some portion of each year. Patients who are critically ill and lack health insurance may be at particularly high risk of morbidity and mortality due to the high cost of intensive care.
To systematically review the medical and nonmedical literature to determine whether differences in critical care access, delivery, and outcomes are associated with health insurance status.
Nine electronic databases (inception to 11 April 2008) were independently screened and abstracted in duplicate.
From 5,508 citations, 29 observational studies met eligibility criteria. Among the general U.S. population, patients who were uninsured were less likely to receive critical care services than those with insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.56). Once admitted to the intensive care unit, patients who were uninsured had 8.5% (95% CI, 6.0-11.1) fewer procedures, were more likely to experience hospital discharge delays (OR 4.51; 95% CI, 1.46-13.93), and were more likely to have life support withdrawn (OR 2.80; 95% CI, 1.12-7.02). Lack of insurance may confer an independent risk of death for patients who are critically ill (OR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). Patients in managed care systems had 14.3% (95% CI, 11.5-17.2) fewer procedures in intensive care, but were also less likely to receive "potentially ineffective" care. Differences in unmeasured confounding factors may contribute to these findings.
Patients in the United States who are critically ill and do not have health insurance receive fewer critical care services and may experience worse clinical outcomes. Improving preexisting health care coverage, as opposed to solely delivering more critical care services, may be one mechanism to reduce such disparities.
三分之一的美国 65 岁以下人群在每年的某些时段没有医疗保险。由于重症监护的高昂费用,没有医疗保险的重症患者可能面临特别高的发病率和死亡率风险。
系统地回顾医学和非医学文献,以确定重症监护的可及性、提供和结果是否与保险状况相关。
独立地筛选了 9 个电子数据库(自建立至 2008 年 4 月 11 日),并进行了重复摘要。
从 5508 篇参考文献中,有 29 项观察性研究符合入选标准。在美国普通人群中,没有保险的患者接受重症监护服务的可能性低于有保险的患者(比值比 [OR],0.56;95%置信区间 [CI],0.55-0.56)。一旦住进重症监护病房,没有保险的患者接受的程序减少了 8.5%(95% CI,6.0-11.1),更有可能出现医院出院延迟(OR 4.51;95% CI,1.46-13.93),更有可能撤销生命支持(OR 2.80;95% CI,1.12-7.02)。对于重症患者,没有保险可能会带来独立的死亡风险(OR 1.16;95% CI,1.01-1.33)。参加管理式医疗系统的患者在重症监护中接受的程序减少了 14.3%(95% CI,11.5-17.2),但接受“可能无效”的治疗的可能性也较小。未测量的混杂因素的差异可能导致了这些发现。
美国没有医疗保险的重症患者接受的重症监护服务较少,可能会出现更差的临床结果。改善现有的医疗保健覆盖范围,而不是仅仅提供更多的重症监护服务,可能是减少这种差异的一种机制。