Willinger B
Abteilung für Klinische Mikrobiologie, Klinisches Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Osterreich.
Mycoses. 2010 May;53 Suppl 1:19-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01836.x.
During several decades microscopy and culture based methods have been the most important techniques for the detection of fungal infections. Culture, though often slow, sometimes insensitive and sometimes confusing with respect to contamination or colonization, may yield the specific aetiological agent, and may allow susceptibility testing to be performed. However, molecular detection and identification using PCR for the amplification of fungal DNA from tissue is being applied more and more frequently for the early diagnosis and identification of fungal pathogens. Other tools such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or DNA microarrays have also been developed and their performance is currently being evaluated. Since standardization and validation for most of these newer techniques are still lacking the combination of various diagnostic tools is still mandatory to allow earlier diagnosis of systemic fungal infections.
在过去几十年里,基于显微镜检查和培养的方法一直是检测真菌感染的最重要技术。培养法虽然往往耗时较长,有时不敏感,有时在污染或定植方面容易造成混淆,但可能会分离出特定的病原体,并可进行药敏试验。然而,利用聚合酶链反应(PCR)从组织中扩增真菌DNA进行分子检测和鉴定,正越来越频繁地应用于真菌病原体的早期诊断和鉴定。其他工具如荧光原位杂交(FISH)或DNA微阵列也已得到开发,其性能目前正在评估中。由于大多数这些较新技术仍缺乏标准化和验证,因此仍必须结合使用各种诊断工具,以便更早地诊断系统性真菌感染。