• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A critique of the specialty certificate examinations of the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the U.K.英国皇家医师学院专业证书考试述评
Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Apr;10(2):141-4. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-2-141.
2
A critique of the specialty certificate examinations of the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the U.K.对英国皇家内科医师学院联合会专业证书考试的批判
Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Oct;10(5):519-20; author reply 520. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-5-519b.
3
Development and implementation of the specialty certificate examinations.专科证书考试的开发与实施。
Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Jun;11(3):235-8. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-3-235.
4
UK postgraduate medicine examinations: opportunities for international candidates.英国研究生医学考试:国际考生的机会。
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Oct;14(5):500-5. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-500.
5
Restarting training and examinations in the era of COVID-19: a perspective from the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians UK.重启 COVID-19 时代的培训和考试:来自英国皇家医师学院联合会的观点。
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 Nov;20(6):e248-e252. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0481. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Academic requirements for Certificate of Completion of Training in surgical training: Consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training/National Research Collaborative Consensus Group.外科培训结业证书的学术要求:培训外科医生协会/国家研究协作共识小组的共识建议。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;36 Suppl 1:S24-S30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.236. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
Establishing the predictive validity of the intercollegiate membership of the Royal Colleges of surgeons written examination: MRCS Part A.确立皇家外科学院会员联合书面考试的预测有效性:皇家外科医师学院会员资格考试第 A 部分。
Surgeon. 2023 Dec;21(6):323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
8
Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.评估手术室受训者的手术技能:一种前瞻性观察研究方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta15010.
9
Specialist anaesthetic training and certification process in England.英格兰的专科麻醉培训与认证流程。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Jul;23(4):614-8.
10
Testing the test: an analysis of the MRCGP Applied Knowledge Test as an assessment tool.检验测试:对作为一种评估工具的全科医生应用知识测试(MRCGP)的分析
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Jan;23(1):13-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494065.

引用本文的文献

1
Empathy scores amongst undergraduate medical students and its correlation to their academic performance.本科医学生的同理心得分及其与学业成绩的相关性。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Apr;10(2):99-104. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.93026.1512.
2
Adaptive Learning in Medical Education: The Final Piece of Technology Enhanced Learning?医学教育中的适应性学习:技术增强学习的最后一块拼图?
Ulster Med J. 2017 Sep;86(3):198-200. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
3
Respiratory specialty specific examinations in the south west.西南部的呼吸专科特定检查。
Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):609. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-609.

本文引用的文献

1
Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends.临床推理研究:过去的历史与当前趋势。
Med Educ. 2005 Apr;39(4):418-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02127.x.

英国皇家医师学院专业证书考试述评

A critique of the specialty certificate examinations of the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the U.K.

机构信息

Hull York Medical School, University of York, York.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Apr;10(2):141-4. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-2-141.

DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.10-2-141
PMID:20437984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4952085/
Abstract

The Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the U.K. has developed a programme to deliver specialty certificate examinations. These are knowledge-based examinations to be passed by all senior trainees in most medical specialties seeking a Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT). These examinations have been evaluated on their validity, reliability, educational impact, cost effectiveness, acceptability and standard setting methodology on the basis of internal evidence and the results of a published pilot. The evidence so far suggests that though reasonable reliability (reproducibility) can be achieved, validity (testing what is intended) may be lacking. Educational impact, cost effectiveness, and acceptability require more evidence. Consistency in standard setting is difficult.

摘要

英国皇家医学院联合会制定了一项计划,以提供专业证书考试。这些是基于知识的考试,面向大多数寻求培训结业证书(CCT)的高级学员。这些考试已经根据内部证据和已发表的试点研究结果,在有效性、可靠性、教育影响、成本效益、可接受性和标准制定方法方面进行了评估。迄今为止的证据表明,虽然可以达到合理的可靠性(可重复性),但可能存在缺乏有效性(测试预期的内容)的问题。教育影响、成本效益和可接受性需要更多的证据。标准制定的一致性很困难。