• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期基于学校的注意力缺陷多动障碍筛查与干预项目对儿童结局及服务获取的影响:一项10岁时的学校试验随访

Impact of early school-based screening and intervention programs for ADHD on children's outcomes and access to services: follow-up of a school-based trial at age 10 years.

作者信息

Sayal Kapil, Owen Victoria, White Kate, Merrell Christine, Tymms Peter, Taylor Eric

机构信息

Section of Developmental Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 May;164(5):462-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.40.

DOI:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.40
PMID:20439798
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of early school-based screening and educational interventions on longer-term outcomes for children at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the predictive utility of teacher ratings.

DESIGN

A population-based 5-year follow-up of a randomized, school-based intervention.

SETTING

Schools in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Children between 4 and 5 years of age with high teacher-rated hyperactivity/inattention scores. Follow-up data were collected on 487 children in 308 schools.

INTERVENTIONS

Following screening, using a 2 x 2 factorial design, schools randomly received an educational intervention (books about ADHD for teachers), the names of children with high hyperactivity/inattention scores between ages 4 and 5 years (identification), both educational intervention and identification, or no intervention.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Parent-rated hyperactivity/inattention, impairment in classroom learning, and access to specialist health services for mental health or behavioral problems.

RESULTS

None of the interventions were associated with improved outcomes. However, children receiving the identification-only intervention were twice as likely as children in the no-intervention group to have high hyperactivity/inattention scores at follow-up (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.00). Regardless of intervention, high baseline hyperactivity/inattention scores were associated with high hyperactivity/inattention and specialist health service use at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence of long-term, generalizable benefits following a school-based universal screening program for ADHD. There may be adverse effects associated with labeling children at a young age.

摘要

目的

探讨早期基于学校的筛查和教育干预对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)风险儿童长期结局的影响以及教师评分的预测效用。

设计

基于人群的随机学校干预5年随访。

地点

英国学校。

参与者

教师评定的多动/注意力不集中得分高的4至5岁儿童。在308所学校对487名儿童收集了随访数据。

干预措施

筛查后,采用2×2析因设计,学校随机接受教育干预(给教师的关于ADHD的书籍)、4至5岁多动/注意力不集中得分高的儿童名单(识别)、教育干预和识别两者,或不进行干预。

结局指标

家长评定的多动/注意力不集中、课堂学习障碍以及获得心理健康或行为问题专科医疗服务的情况。

结果

没有一项干预措施与改善结局相关。然而,仅接受识别干预的儿童在随访时多动/注意力不集中得分高的可能性是未干预组儿童的两倍(调整优势比,2.11;95%置信区间,1.12 - 4.00)。无论干预情况如何,基线多动/注意力不集中得分高与随访时多动/注意力不集中得分高及使用专科医疗服务相关。

结论

我们未发现针对ADHD的基于学校的普遍筛查项目有长期、可推广益处的证据。在幼年给儿童贴标签可能存在不良影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of early school-based screening and intervention programs for ADHD on children's outcomes and access to services: follow-up of a school-based trial at age 10 years.早期基于学校的注意力缺陷多动障碍筛查与干预项目对儿童结局及服务获取的影响:一项10岁时的学校试验随访
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 May;164(5):462-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.40.
2
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a brief school-based group programme for parents of children at risk of ADHD: a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项针对多动症风险儿童家长的简短校内小组项目的有效性和成本效益:一项整群随机对照试验
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Jul;42(4):521-33. doi: 10.1111/cch.12349.
4
Inattention, hyperactivity, and school performance in a population of school-age children with complex congenital heart disease.患有复杂先天性心脏病的学龄儿童群体中的注意力不集中、多动及学业表现
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e759-67. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1066.
5
Impact of a behavioural sleep intervention on symptoms and sleep in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and parental mental health: randomised controlled trial.行为睡眠干预对注意缺陷多动障碍儿童症状和睡眠及父母心理健康的影响:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 20;350:h68. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h68.
6
Inattention in very preterm children: implications for screening and detection.早产儿注意力不集中:对筛查和检测的影响。
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Sep;99(9):834-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305532. Epub 2014 May 19.
7
Childhood trajectories of inattention and hyperactivity and prediction of educational attainment in early adulthood: a 16-year longitudinal population-based study.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍轨迹与成年早期教育程度的关系:一项长达 16 年的基于人群的纵向研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;168(11):1164-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10121732. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
8
Predictors of and barriers to service use for children at risk of ADHD: longitudinal study.预测 ADHD 风险儿童的服务利用的因素和障碍:纵向研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 May;24(5):545-52. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0606-z. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
9
Sustained Effects of Collaborative School-Home Intervention for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Impairment.协同家校干预对注意缺陷/多动障碍症状和损害的持续影响。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;57(4):245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Inattention and hyperactivity and the achievement gap among urban minority youth.注意缺陷多动障碍与城市少数族裔青年的学业成绩差距。
J Sch Health. 2011 Oct;81(10):641-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00639.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Debate: Are we overpathologising young people's mental health? Research shows otherwise - mental health conditions are not being recognised or diagnosed in healthcare settings.辩论:我们是否过度诊断年轻人的心理健康问题?研究表明并非如此——心理健康状况在医疗环境中未得到识别或诊断。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Sep;30(3):305-307. doi: 10.1111/camh.70019. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Behavioural disorders and sleep problems in Sanfilippo syndrome: overlaps with some other conditions and importance indications.桑菲力波综合征中的行为障碍与睡眠问题:与其他一些病症的重叠及重要指征
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;34(6):1795-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02661-5. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
3
Contributors to Underdiagnosis of ADHD among Asian Americans: A Narrative Review.
亚裔美国人注意缺陷多动障碍漏诊的原因:叙事性综述。
J Atten Disord. 2024 Oct;28(12):1499-1519. doi: 10.1177/10870547241264113. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Contextual determinants associated with children's and adolescents' mental health care utilization: a systematic review.与儿童和青少年心理健康护理利用相关的背景因素:一项系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;33(7):2051-2065. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-02077-5. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
5
Developing a Web-Based App to Assess Mental Health Difficulties in Secondary School Pupils: Qualitative User-Centered Design Study.开发一款基于网络的应用程序以评估中学生的心理健康问题:以用户为中心的定性设计研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 10;6(1):e30565. doi: 10.2196/30565.
6
Overdiagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Scoping Review.儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的过度诊断:系统范围综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5335.
7
Evaluating the Cost of Prevention Programming and Universal Screening with Discrete Event Simulation.使用离散事件模拟评估预防计划和普遍筛查的成本。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Nov;48(6):962-973. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01108-8. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Predicts Concurrent Mental Health Difficulties in a Transdiagnostic Sample of Struggling Learners.优势与困难问卷可预测学习困难的跨诊断样本中并发的心理健康问题。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 12;11:587821. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587821. eCollection 2020.
9
Non-pharmacologic management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a review.儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍的非药物治疗:综述
Transl Pediatr. 2020 Feb;9(Suppl 1):S114-S124. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.10.01.
10
Interventions to improve children's access to mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善儿童获得心理健康服务机会的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Oct 17;29:e58. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000544.