Sayal Kapil, Owen Victoria, White Kate, Merrell Christine, Tymms Peter, Taylor Eric
Section of Developmental Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 May;164(5):462-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.40.
To investigate the impact of early school-based screening and educational interventions on longer-term outcomes for children at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the predictive utility of teacher ratings.
A population-based 5-year follow-up of a randomized, school-based intervention.
Schools in England.
Children between 4 and 5 years of age with high teacher-rated hyperactivity/inattention scores. Follow-up data were collected on 487 children in 308 schools.
Following screening, using a 2 x 2 factorial design, schools randomly received an educational intervention (books about ADHD for teachers), the names of children with high hyperactivity/inattention scores between ages 4 and 5 years (identification), both educational intervention and identification, or no intervention.
Parent-rated hyperactivity/inattention, impairment in classroom learning, and access to specialist health services for mental health or behavioral problems.
None of the interventions were associated with improved outcomes. However, children receiving the identification-only intervention were twice as likely as children in the no-intervention group to have high hyperactivity/inattention scores at follow-up (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.00). Regardless of intervention, high baseline hyperactivity/inattention scores were associated with high hyperactivity/inattention and specialist health service use at follow-up.
We did not find evidence of long-term, generalizable benefits following a school-based universal screening program for ADHD. There may be adverse effects associated with labeling children at a young age.
探讨早期基于学校的筛查和教育干预对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)风险儿童长期结局的影响以及教师评分的预测效用。
基于人群的随机学校干预5年随访。
英国学校。
教师评定的多动/注意力不集中得分高的4至5岁儿童。在308所学校对487名儿童收集了随访数据。
筛查后,采用2×2析因设计,学校随机接受教育干预(给教师的关于ADHD的书籍)、4至5岁多动/注意力不集中得分高的儿童名单(识别)、教育干预和识别两者,或不进行干预。
家长评定的多动/注意力不集中、课堂学习障碍以及获得心理健康或行为问题专科医疗服务的情况。
没有一项干预措施与改善结局相关。然而,仅接受识别干预的儿童在随访时多动/注意力不集中得分高的可能性是未干预组儿童的两倍(调整优势比,2.11;95%置信区间,1.12 - 4.00)。无论干预情况如何,基线多动/注意力不集中得分高与随访时多动/注意力不集中得分高及使用专科医疗服务相关。
我们未发现针对ADHD的基于学校的普遍筛查项目有长期、可推广益处的证据。在幼年给儿童贴标签可能存在不良影响。