Suppr超能文献

基于社区的女性样本中修订版冲突策略量表(CTS2)10 因素模型的因子结构和信度。

Factor structure and reliability of the revised conflict tactics scales' (CTS2) 10-factor model in a community-based female sample.

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Chrysler Hall North, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2011 Mar;26(4):719-44. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365857. Epub 2010 May 4.

Abstract

The present study investigated the factor structure and reliability of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales' (CTS2) 10-factor model in a community-based female sample (N = 261). The underlying factor structure of the 10-factor model was tested by the confirmatory multiple group factor analysis, which demonstrated complex factor cross-loadings across the subscales for both perpetration and victimization. This confirmatory factor analysis also identified a lack of exclusive factor loadings between minor and severe distinctions of the eight violence measures. Internal consistency of the subscales was generally acceptable (.68-.85 for perpetration and .68-.84 for victimization), except for the Sexual Coercion subscale; the alpha coefficients of the Sexual Coercion Minor subscale were .18 for perpetration and .37 for victimization. Practical implications related to complex factor cross-loadings and internal consistency were discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)10 因素模型在基于社区的女性样本(N=261)中的结构和信度。通过验证性多组因子分析检验了 10 因素模型的潜在因子结构,该分析表明,在侵害者和受害者两个亚组中,各分量表之间存在复杂的因子交叉负荷。这种验证性因子分析还发现,在八项暴力措施的轻微和严重区分之间,缺乏排他性的因子负荷。除了性胁迫分量表外,各分量表的内部一致性通常是可以接受的(侵害者为.68-.85,受害者为.68-.84);性胁迫轻微分量表的 alpha 系数分别为侵害者的.18 和受害者的.37。讨论了与复杂因子交叉负荷和内部一致性相关的实际意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验