Suppr超能文献

一项针对家庭暴力机构的国家强制评估实践的全国性调查。

A nationwide survey of state-mandated evaluation practices for domestic violence agencies.

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago, IL 60607-7137, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2011 Jan;26(1):50-70. doi: 10.1177/0886260510362887. Epub 2010 May 4.

Abstract

Many agencies serving survivors of domestic violence are required to evaluate their services. Three possible evaluation strategies include: a) process measurement, which typically involves a frequency count of agency activities, such as the number of counseling hours given; b) outcome evaluation, which measures the impact of agency activities on clients, such as increased understanding of the dynamics of abuse; or c) performance measurement, which assesses the extent to which agencies achieve their stated goals. Findings of a telephone survey of state funders of domestic violence agencies in the United States revealed that most states (67%) require only process measurement, while fewer than 10% require performance measurement. Most (69%) funders reported satisfaction with their evaluation strategy and emphasized the need for involvement of all stakeholders, especially grantees, in developing an evaluation.

摘要

许多为家庭暴力幸存者提供服务的机构都需要对其服务进行评估。有三种可能的评估策略:a)过程测量,通常涉及对机构活动的频率进行计数,例如提供的咨询小时数;b)结果评估,衡量机构活动对客户的影响,例如增加对虐待动态的理解;或 c)绩效测量,评估机构实现其既定目标的程度。对美国家庭暴力机构州资助者的电话调查结果显示,大多数州(67%)仅要求进行过程测量,而要求进行绩效测量的不到 10%。大多数(69%)资助者对其评估策略表示满意,并强调需要所有利益相关者,特别是受赠人,参与制定评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验