Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Newham Centre for Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London E13 8SP, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;46(7):615-21. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0227-x. Epub 2010 May 5.
Various studies assessed mental disorders and psychological symptoms following natural disasters, including earthquakes. Yet, samples were often non-representative, and the periods of time between earthquake and assessments were usually short. This study aims to assess the prevalence of mental disorders, level of psychological symptoms and subjective quality of life in a random sample in a rural region in Italy 8 years after an earthquake.
Using a random sampling method, a pool of potential participants of working age who had experienced the earthquake were identified 8 years after the earthquake. They were sequentially approached until the target sample of 200 was reached. Mental disorders were assessed on the MINI, psychological symptoms on the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and subjective quality of life on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).
200 people were interviewed, and the response rate of contacted people was 43%. In the MINI, 15 participants (7.5%) had any type of mental disorder; 5 participants had PTSD at any time since the earthquake, and 1 participant at the time of the interview. Symptom levels were low (Global Severity Index of BSI mean = 0.29, SD = 0.30; IES total mean = 0.40, SD = 3.33) and subjective quality of life (MANSA mean = 5.26, SD = 0.59) was in a positive range. The distribution of mental health outcomes made it difficult to explore factors associated with them.
There is no evidence that the earthquake had a negative impact on the mental health of the affected population years later. Possible reasons include the relatively weak nature of the earthquake, strong community support that helped overcome mental distress, the long period of time (8 years) between the occurrence of the earthquake and the study, and a capacity of people to maintain or restore mental health after a natural disaster in the long term.
多项研究评估了自然灾害(包括地震)后出现的精神障碍和心理症状。然而,这些样本往往不具有代表性,而且地震与评估之间的时间间隔通常很短。本研究旨在评估 8 年后意大利农村地区随机样本中精神障碍的患病率、心理症状水平和主观生活质量。
使用随机抽样方法,在地震 8 年后确定了一个有工作年龄的潜在参与者的蓄水池。他们依次被接触,直到达到 200 人的目标样本。使用 MINI 评估精神障碍,使用 Brief Symptom Inventory(BSI)和 Impact of Event Scale-Revised(IES-R)评估心理症状,使用 Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life(MANSA)评估主观生活质量。
对 200 人进行了访谈,联系到的人的回复率为 43%。在 MINI 中,15 名参与者(7.5%)患有任何类型的精神障碍;5 名参与者在地震后任何时候都患有 PTSD,1 名参与者在采访时患有 PTSD。症状水平较低(BSI 总平均 = 0.29,SD = 0.30;IES 总平均 = 0.40,SD = 3.33),主观生活质量(MANSA 平均 = 5.26,SD = 0.59)处于积极范围。心理健康结果的分布使得很难探讨与它们相关的因素。
没有证据表明地震对受灾人群多年后的心理健康产生了负面影响。可能的原因包括地震的性质相对较弱、强大的社区支持有助于克服精神困扰、地震发生和研究之间的时间间隔较长,以及人们在自然灾害后长期保持或恢复心理健康的能力。