Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Dev Sci. 2010 May;13(3):421-429. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00896.x.
Two studies compared children's attention to sample composition - whether a sample provides a diverse representation of a category of interest - during teacher-led and learner-driven learning contexts. In Study 1 (n = 48), 5-year-olds attended to sample composition to make inferences about biological properties only when samples were presented by a knowledgeable teacher. In contrast, adults attended to sample composition in both teacher-led and learner-driven contexts. In Study 2 (n = 51), 6-year-olds chose to create diverse samples to teach information about biological kinds to another child, but not to discover new information for themselves, whereas adults chose to create diverse samples for both teaching and information discovery. Results suggest that how children approach the interpretation and selection of evidence varies depending on whether learning occurs in a pedagogical or a non-pedagogical context.
两项研究比较了儿童在教师主导和学习者驱动的学习环境中对样本组成(样本是否提供了感兴趣类别的多样化代表)的注意力。在研究 1(n = 48)中,只有当样本由知识渊博的教师呈现时,5 岁儿童才会关注样本组成,以便对生物属性进行推断。相比之下,成年人在教师主导和学习者驱动的环境中都会关注样本组成。在研究 2(n = 51)中,6 岁儿童选择创建多样化的样本,以便向另一个孩子教授有关生物种类的信息,但不会自己发现新信息,而成年人则选择创建多样化的样本,既用于教学,也用于信息发现。结果表明,儿童在解释和选择证据时的方法取决于学习是在教学环境还是非教学环境中进行。