Suppr超能文献

多中心研究确定用于预测金黄色葡萄球菌中高水平和低水平莫匹罗星耐药性的纸片扩散和肉汤微量稀释标准。

Multicenter study to determine disk diffusion and broth microdilution criteria for prediction of high- and low-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

机构信息

Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jul;48(7):2469-75. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00340-10. Epub 2010 May 5.

Abstract

Mupirocin susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus has become more important as mupirocin is used more widely to suppress or eliminate S. aureus colonization and prevent subsequent health care- and community-associated infections. The present multicenter study evaluated two susceptibility testing screening methods to detect mupirocin high-level resistance (HLR), broth microdilution (BMD) MICs of >or=512 microg/ml, and a 6-mm zone diameter for a disk diffusion (DD) test with a 200-microg disk. Initial testing indicated that with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methods for BMD and DD testing, the optimal conditions for the detection of mupirocin HLR were 24 h of incubation and reading of the DD zone diameters with transmitted light. Using the presence or absence of mupA as the "gold standard" for HLR, the sensitivity and specificity of a single-well 256 microg/ml BMD test were 97 and 99%, respectively, and those for the 200-microg disk test were 98 and 99%, respectively. Testing with two disks, 200 microg and 5 microg, was evaluated for its ability to distinguish HLR isolates (MICs >or= 512 microg/ml), low-level-resistant (LLR) isolates (MICs = 8 to 256 microg/ml), and susceptible isolates (MICs <or= 4 microg/ml). Using no zone with both disks as an indication of HLR and no zone with the 5-microg disk plus any zone with the 200-microg disk as LLR, only 3 of the 340 isolates were misclassified, with 3 susceptible isolates being classified as LLR. Use of standardized MIC or disk tests could enable the detection of emerging high- and low-level mupirocin resistance in S. aureus.

摘要

金黄色葡萄球菌的莫匹罗星药敏试验变得越来越重要,因为莫匹罗星被更广泛地用于抑制或消除金黄色葡萄球菌定植,并预防随后的医源性和社区相关性感染。本多中心研究评估了两种药敏筛选方法,以检测莫匹罗星高水平耐药(HLR),肉汤微量稀释(BMD)MIC >或=512μg/ml,和 200μg 纸片的纸片扩散(DD)试验 6mm 抑菌圈直径。初步检测表明,采用临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)BMD 和 DD 检测方法,检测莫匹罗星 HLR 的最佳条件是孵育 24 小时,并用透射光读取 DD 抑菌圈直径。以 mupA 的存在或缺失作为 HLR 的“金标准”,256μg/ml 单孔 BMD 试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为 97%和 99%,200μg 纸片试验分别为 98%和 99%。评估了两个纸片,200μg 和 5μg,用于区分 HLR 分离株(MIC >或=512μg/ml)、低水平耐药(LLR)分离株(MIC=8-256μg/ml)和敏感分离株(MIC <或=4μg/ml)的能力。如果两个纸片均无抑菌圈提示 HLR,如果 5μg 纸片无抑菌圈而 200μg 纸片有抑菌圈提示 LLR,则只有 340 株分离株中的 3 株被错误分类,3 株敏感分离株被错误分类为 LLR。使用标准化 MIC 或纸片检测可以检测金黄色葡萄球菌中出现的高、低水平莫匹罗星耐药性。

相似文献

5

引用本文的文献

6
Mupirocin-resistant in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.耐莫匹星的在非洲:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Aug 15;7:101. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0382-5. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Mupirocin resistance.莫匹罗星耐药性
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 15;49(6):935-41. doi: 10.1086/605495.
3
Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006.医疗机构中多重耐药菌的管理,2006年
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S165-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.006.
6
9
Improvement of mupirocin E-test for susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus.
J Med Microbiol. 2003 May;52(Pt 5):385-387. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05011-0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验