Department of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 Mar;29(2):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00120.x.
Screening and brief intervention (SBI) are considered good prevention strategies for alcohol-related problems in Primary Health Care (PHC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the process of an SBI implementation program for alcohol risk use and evaluate the factors that facilitated or impeded this implementation, in two PHC settings at the Brazilian city of Juiz de Fora.
Case 1 public PHC services and case 2 the PHC service of the Military Police. Participants were trained on SBI strategies and supervised during 6 months. The qualitative methodology of action research was used. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Case 1: 70 participants; facilitating factors: good expectations about the project; simplicity of SBI technique; collaborative way the project was planned. Barriers: lack of time; discomfort in dealing with alcohol issues; focus on alcohol-dependence; unstable political environment; other priorities; difficulties in patients' referral. Case 2: nine participants. Facilitating factors: simplicity of SBI technique; collaborative way the project was planned; importance of alcohol issues; data confidentiality and the voluntary work to do SBI. Barriers: only one health professional in the group; the variability of the institutional support; organisational culture about alcohol use.
The barriers and facilitators were related to two main factors: organisational culture and personal attitudes. The action research provided the opportunity to bridge the gap between research and practice, but it also showed that SBI faces significant challenges before it can be implemented as a routine procedure in PHC settings in Brazil.
在初级卫生保健(PHC)中,筛查和简短干预(SBI)被认为是预防与酒精相关问题的良好策略。本研究的目的是评估在巴西儒埃泽拉市的两个 PHC 环境中,对酒精风险使用进行 SBI 实施计划的过程,并评估促进或阻碍该实施的因素。
案例 1 为公立 PHC 服务,案例 2 为宪兵 PHC 服务。参与者接受了 SBI 策略培训,并在 6 个月内接受监督。采用行动研究的定性方法。使用主题分析对数据进行分析。
案例 1:70 名参与者;促进因素:对项目的良好期望;SBI 技术简单;项目规划的协作方式。障碍:时间不足;处理酒精问题的不适;关注酒精依赖;不稳定的政治环境;其他优先事项;患者转诊困难。案例 2:9 名参与者。促进因素:SBI 技术简单;项目规划的协作方式;酒精问题的重要性;数据保密性和自愿进行 SBI 的工作。障碍:小组中只有一名卫生专业人员;机构支持的可变性;关于酒精使用的组织文化。
障碍和促进因素与两个主要因素有关:组织文化和个人态度。行动研究提供了弥合研究与实践之间差距的机会,但也表明 SBI 在巴西的 PHC 环境中作为常规程序实施之前,面临着重大挑战。