Clinical Institute of Laboratory Diagnosis, Zagreb Clinical Hospital Center and University School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2010 Feb;32(1 Pt 2):33-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2008.01111.x.
Modern photo-optical coagulometers collect optical data in the form of reaction curves and offer a possibility to determine clotting times at different points of clot formation by using different evaluation modes. The objectives of this study were to determine the possible impact of an evaluation mode on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) results and to investigate potential benefits from visual inspection of obtained reaction curves. APTT was determined by using actin FS as reagent on two coagulometers (Siemens Medical Solutions) in 174 plasma samples with three different evaluation modes: fixed absorbance (FA), drifting baseline (DB), and point of inflexion (POI) on Behring coagulation timer (BCT), and with DB mode on Behring coagulation system (BCS). Statistically significant difference of APTT results applying the Friedman's test (P<0.0001) followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test (P<0.05) was obtained in all tested samples between POI mode and all other evaluation modes, independently of analyzer used. The differences obtained indicated that laboratory professionals must be aware of possible different evaluation modes on different analyzers, and establish evaluation mode-specific reference intervals. Moreover, correctness of a reported result could be confirmed only by visual analysis of the reaction curve.
现代光电凝血仪以反应曲线的形式收集光学数据,并提供了通过使用不同的评估模式在不同的凝血点确定凝血时间的可能性。本研究的目的是确定评估模式对活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)结果的可能影响,并研究从获得的反应曲线进行目视检查的潜在好处。使用 Actin FS 作为试剂,在两台凝血仪(西门子医疗解决方案公司)上对 174 个血浆样本进行了 APTT 测定,有三种不同的评估模式:固定吸光度(FA)、漂移基线(DB)和 Behring 凝血计时器(BCT)的拐点(POI),以及 Behring 凝血系统(BCS)上的 DB 模式。在所有测试样本中,应用 Friedman 检验(P<0.0001),然后是 Dunn 多重比较检验(P<0.05),在 POI 模式和所有其他评估模式之间,无论是使用哪台分析仪,均获得了 APTT 结果的统计学显著差异。获得的差异表明,实验室专业人员必须意识到不同分析仪上可能存在不同的评估模式,并建立评估模式特定的参考区间。此外,只有通过对反应曲线进行目视分析,才能确认报告结果的正确性。