University of Washington, Seattle 98105, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Feb;26(3):539-66. doi: 10.1177/0886260510363422. Epub 2010 May 6.
Domestic violence advocates and researchers advocate for a survivor-centered approach for assisting women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV), with individualized safety plans and services; yet little empirical work has been done to determine IPV survivors' specific combinations of vulnerabilities and assets that might inform such an approach. Using latent profile analysis of a cohort of 448 survivors, five distinct subgroups were previously identified in terms of biopsychosocial asset and vulnerability profiles. The purpose of the current study was to apply person-oriented methodology for survivor-centered investigation of differences in help-seeking and protective actions according to subgroup membership within this cohort. Though not differing demographically, the subgroups were found to differ significantly and meaningfully in their patterns of IPV help-seeking and protective actions. Thus, reliance on population-aggregate linear relationships between IPV exposure and safety efforts may risk overlooking important variation by vulnerability and asset profile, and knowledge of distinct clusters among functioning profiles may help with understanding of survivors' coping strategies.The authors outline service-need considerations across the subgroups and provide guidance for targeted outreach, locating IPV survivors and matching services to their needs.
家庭暴力倡导者和研究人员提倡采用以幸存者为中心的方法来帮助经历亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的女性,制定个性化的安全计划和服务;然而,很少有实证工作来确定 IPV 幸存者可能影响这种方法的具体脆弱性和资产组合。使用对 448 名幸存者的队列进行潜在剖面分析,根据生物心理社会资产和脆弱性概况,先前确定了五个不同的亚组。本研究的目的是应用面向个体的方法,根据该队列中亚组的成员身份,对寻求帮助和采取保护行为的差异进行以幸存者为中心的调查。尽管在人口统计学上没有差异,但发现这些亚组在 IPV 寻求帮助和采取保护行为的模式上存在显著且有意义的差异。因此,依赖 IPV 暴露与安全工作之间的人口总体线性关系可能会忽略脆弱性和资产状况的重要差异,而对功能概况中不同集群的了解可能有助于理解幸存者的应对策略。作者概述了各个亚组的服务需求考虑因素,并为有针对性的外展、定位 IPV 幸存者以及将服务与他们的需求相匹配提供了指导。