Duenwald Sarah E, Vanderby Ray, Lakes Roderic S
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1687, USA.
Biorheology. 2010;47(1):1-14. doi: 10.3233/BIR-2010-0559.
Accurate joint models require the ability to predict soft tissue behavior. This study evaluates the ability of constitutive equations to predict the nonlinear and viscoelastic behavior of tendon and ligament during stress relaxation testing in a porcine model. Three constitutive equations are compared in their ability to model relaxation, recovery and reloading of tissues. Quasi-linear viscoelasticity (QLV) can fit a single stress relaxation curve, but fails to account for the strain-dependence in relaxation. Nonlinear superposition can fit the single relaxation curve and will account for the strain-dependent relaxation behavior, but fails to accurately predict recovery behavior. Schapery's nonlinear viscoelastic model successfully fits a single relaxation curve, accounts for strain-dependent relaxation behavior, and accurately predicts recovery and reloading behavior. Comparing Schapery's model to QLV and nonlinear superposition, Schapery's method was uniquely capable of fitting the different nonlinearities that arise in stress relaxation curves from different tissues, e.g. the porcine digital flexor tendon and the porcine medial collateral ligament (MCL), as well as predicting subsequent recovery and relaxation curves after initial loads.
精确的关节模型需要具备预测软组织行为的能力。本研究评估了本构方程在猪模型应力松弛测试期间预测肌腱和韧带的非线性及粘弹性行为的能力。比较了三种本构方程对组织松弛、恢复和再加载的建模能力。准线性粘弹性(QLV)可以拟合单一应力松弛曲线,但无法解释松弛过程中的应变依赖性。非线性叠加可以拟合单一松弛曲线,并能解释应变依赖性松弛行为,但无法准确预测恢复行为。沙佩里(Schapery)的非线性粘弹性模型成功拟合了单一松弛曲线,解释了应变依赖性松弛行为,并准确预测了恢复和再加载行为。将沙佩里的模型与QLV和非线性叠加进行比较,沙佩里的方法能够独特地拟合不同组织(如猪指屈肌腱和猪内侧副韧带(MCL))应力松弛曲线中出现的不同非线性,以及预测初始加载后的后续恢复和松弛曲线。