Information Center, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Bone. 2010 Aug;47(2):413-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 May 7.
Effects of soy isoflavone supplements on bone turnover markers remain unclear. This up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed primarily to more completely and precisely clarify the effects on urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) and serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and secondarily to evaluate the effects on other bone turnover markers, compared with placebo in menopausal women.
PubMed, CENTRAL, ICHUSHI, and CNKI were searched in June 2009 for relevant studies of RCTs. Data on study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes were extracted and methodological quality of each included trial was assessed.
From 3740 identified relevant articles, 10 (887 participants), 10 (1210 participants), and 8 (380 participants) RCTs were selected for meta-analysis of effects on DPD, BAP, and serum osteocalcin (OC), respectively, using Review Manager 5.0.22. Daily ingestion of an average 56 mg soy isoflavones (aglycone equivalents) for 10 weeks to 12 months significantly decreased DPD by 14.1% (95% CI: -26.8% to -1.5%; P=0.03) compared to baseline (heterogeneity: P<0.00001; I(2)=93%; random effects model). The overall effect of soy isoflavones on DPD compared with placebo was a significant decrease of -18.0% (95% CI: -28.4% to -7.7%, P=0.0007; heterogeneity: P=0.0001; I(2)=73%; random effects model). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions revealed that isoflavone dose and intervention duration did not significantly relate to the variable effects on DPD. Daily supplementation of about 84 mg and 73 mg of soy isoflavones for up to 12 months insignificantly increased BAP by 8.0% (95% CI: -4.2% to 20.2%, P=0.20; heterogeneity: P<0.00001; I(2)=98%) and OC by 10.3% (95% CI: -3.1% to 23.7%, P=0.13; heterogeneity: P=0.002; I(2)=69%) compared with placebo (random effects model), respectively.
Soy isoflavone supplements moderately decreased the bone resorption marker DPD, but did not affect bone formation markers BAP and OC in menopausal women. The effects varied between studies, and further studies are needed to address factors relating to the observed effects of soy isoflavones on DPD and to verify effects on other bone turnover markers.
大豆异黄酮补充剂对骨转换标志物的影响仍不清楚。本项最新的系统评价和随机对照试验(RCT)荟萃分析主要是为了更全面和精确地阐明大豆异黄酮对绝经后妇女尿脱氧吡啶啉(DPD)和血清骨碱性磷酸酶(BAP)的影响,其次是评估其对其他骨转换标志物的影响,与安慰剂相比。
2009 年 6 月,我们在 PubMed、CENTRAL、ICHHUSHI 和 CNKI 中检索了相关的 RCT 研究。提取了研究设计、参与者、干预措施和结局的数据,并对每个纳入试验的方法学质量进行了评估。
从 3740 篇相关文章中,我们选择了 10 项(887 名参与者)、10 项(1210 名参与者)和 8 项(380 名参与者)RCT 来进行荟萃分析,以评估大豆异黄酮对 DPD、BAP 和血清骨钙素(OC)的影响,使用 Review Manager 5.0.22。每日摄入 56mg 大豆异黄酮(糖苷配基当量)平均 10 周至 12 个月,与基线相比,DPD 显著下降 14.1%(95%CI:-26.8%至-1.5%;P=0.03)(异质性:P<0.00001;I(2)=93%;随机效应模型)。与安慰剂相比,大豆异黄酮对 DPD 的总体影响为-18.0%(95%CI:-28.4%至-7.7%,P=0.0007;异质性:P=0.0001;I(2)=73%;随机效应模型)。亚组分析和荟萃回归显示,异黄酮剂量和干预持续时间与 DPD 的可变效应无显著相关性。每日补充约 84mg 和 73mg 的大豆异黄酮,持续 12 个月,对 BAP 的影响分别增加 8.0%(95%CI:-4.2%至 20.2%,P=0.20;异质性:P<0.00001;I(2)=98%)和 OC 增加 10.3%(95%CI:-3.1%至 23.7%,P=0.13;异质性:P=0.002;I(2)=69%),与安慰剂相比(随机效应模型)。
大豆异黄酮补充剂适度降低了骨吸收标志物 DPD,但对绝经后妇女的骨形成标志物 BAP 和 OC 没有影响。研究之间的影响存在差异,需要进一步的研究来确定与大豆异黄酮对 DPD 的观察到的影响相关的因素,并验证其对其他骨转换标志物的影响。