INRA, UMR 1069 Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation, F-35000 Rennes, France.
J Environ Manage. 2010 Sep;91(9):1831-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 10.
Soybean production and its supply chain are highly dependent on inputs such as land, fertilizer, fuel, machines, pesticides and electricity. The expansion of this crop in Brazil in recent decades has generated concerns about its environmental impacts. To assess these impacts, two representative chains supplying soybeans to Europe were identified: Center West (CW) and Southern (SO) Brazil. Each supply chain was analyzed using Life Cycle Assessment methodology. We considered different levels of use of chemical and organic fertilizers, pesticides and machinery, different distances for transportation of inputs and different yield levels. Because transportation contributed strongly to environmental impacts, a detailed study was performed to identify the routes used to transport soybeans to seaports. Additionally, we considered different levels of land occupation and land transformation to represent the impact of deforestation in the CW region. Environmental impacts were calculated for 1000 kg of soybean up to and including the delivery to Europe at the seaport in Rotterdam, at 13% humidity. Overall results showed that the impacts are greater for CW than for SO for all impact categories studied, including acidification (7.7 and 5.3 kg SO(2) eq., respectively), climate change (959 and 510 kg CO(2) eq.), cumulative energy demand (12,634 and 6,999 MJ) and terrestrial ecotoxicity (4.9 and 3.1 kg 1,4-DCB eq.), except eutrophication and land occupation. The same trend was observed for the crop-production stage. Efforts to reduce chemical fertilizers and diesel consumption can reduce CO(2) emissions. Although deforestation for crop production has decreased in recent years, the contribution of deforestation to climate change and cumulative energy demand remains significant. In the CW scenario deforestation contributed 29% to climate change and 20% to cumulative energy demand. Results also showed that although there are different transportation options in Brazil, the current predominance of road transport causes severe environmental impacts. In CW, road transport contributed 19% to climate change and 24% to cumulative energy demand, while in SO it contributed 12% and 15% to these impacts, respectively. Improvements in the logistics of transportation, giving priority to rail and river transports over road transport, can contribute significantly to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and decreasing energy use. Future studies involving Brazilian soybeans should take into account the region of origin as different levels of environmental impact are predicted.
大豆生产及其供应链高度依赖土地、化肥、燃料、机器、农药和电力等投入。近年来,巴西大豆种植的扩张引发了人们对其环境影响的担忧。为了评估这些影响,确定了供应给欧洲的两条具有代表性的大豆供应链:中西部(CW)和南部(SO)巴西。使用生命周期评估方法对每个供应链进行了分析。我们考虑了不同水平的化肥、农药和机械的使用,不同的投入运输距离和不同的产量水平。由于运输对环境影响贡献很大,因此进行了详细的研究以确定运输大豆到海港的路线。此外,我们还考虑了不同的土地占用和土地转化水平,以代表 CW 地区森林砍伐的影响。计算了 1000 公斤大豆从生产到包括在鹿特丹海港运送到欧洲的各个阶段的环境影响,相对湿度为 13%。总体结果表明,对于所有研究的影响类别,包括酸化(分别为 7.7 和 5.3 公斤 SO2eq)、气候变化(959 和 510 公斤 CO2eq)、累积能源需求(12634 和 6999 MJ)和陆地生态毒性(4.9 和 3.1 公斤 14-DCB eq),CW 的影响大于 SO,除了富营养化和土地占用。在作物生产阶段也观察到了相同的趋势。减少化肥和柴油消耗的努力可以减少 CO2 的排放。尽管近年来大豆种植的森林砍伐有所减少,但森林砍伐对气候变化和累积能源需求的贡献仍然很大。在 CW 情景中,森林砍伐对气候变化的贡献为 29%,对累积能源需求的贡献为 20%。结果还表明,尽管巴西有不同的运输选择,但目前道路运输的主导地位造成了严重的环境影响。在 CW,道路运输对气候变化的贡献为 19%,对累积能源需求的贡献为 24%,而在 SO,道路运输对这些影响的贡献分别为 12%和 15%。改善运输物流,优先考虑铁路和河流运输而不是道路运输,可以大大减少温室气体排放,降低能源使用。涉及巴西大豆的未来研究应考虑到起源地区,因为预计会有不同水平的环境影响。