Justified limits on refusing intervention.
作者信息
Chervenak F A, McCullough L B
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, N.Y.
出版信息
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr;21(2):12-8.
PMID:2045276
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Justified limits on refusing intervention.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr;21(2):12-8.
2
Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.产科的法院强制治疗：伦理观点与法律框架
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Mar;79(3):476-7; author reply 478-9.
3
C-section for organ donation.为器官捐赠进行剖宫产手术。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Mar-Apr;20(2):22; discussion 22-4.
4
Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective.强制剖宫产：伦理视角
Prim Care. 1993 Sep;20(3):721-8.
5
The relationship of autonomy and integrity in medical ethics.医学伦理中自主性与完整性的关系。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1990;24(4):361-71.
6
Point: patient control of treatment is essential.要点：患者对治疗的掌控至关重要。
Arthritis Care Res. 1990 Sep;3(3):163-6.
7
The place of autonomy in bioethics.自主权在生物伦理学中的地位。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Jan-Feb;20(1):12-7.
8
Counterpoint: is patient control of treatment always appropriate?反驳观点：患者对治疗的控制总是合适的吗？
Arthritis Care Res. 1990 Sep;3(3):167-70.
9
Maternal-fetal conflict: a study of physician concerns in court-ordered cesarean sections.
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Winter;1(4):316-9.
10
The maternal-fetal dyad. Exploring the two-patient obstetric model.母婴二元组。探索双患者产科模式。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Jan-Feb;22(1):13-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.超声的“子宫之窗”在平衡孕产妇和胎儿健康利益方面带来了伦理挑战：澳大利亚产科医生的经历
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0023-y.
Zotero 插件