Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LWL Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 2010 Feb 26;15(2):70-8. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-2-70.
Several studies have shown persistent neurocognitive impairment in patients with a bipolar affective disorder (BD) even in euthymia as well as in patients with a schizoaffective disorder (SAD). The aim of our study was to compare the neuropsychological performance between these two groups. Confounding variables were controlled to enhance our understanding of cognitive dysfunction in both BD and SAD.
Several domains of neurocognitive function, executive function, memory, attention, concentration and perceptuomotor function were examined in 28 euthymic SAD patients and 32 BD patients by using a neuropsychological test battery. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were used to evaluate the patients' clinical status. Data analysis was performed by using a multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA/MANCOVA).
Euthymic SAD patients showed greater cognitive impairment than euthymic BD patients in the tested domains including declarative memory and attention. Putative significant group differences concerning cognitive flexibility vanished when controlled for demographic and clinical variables. Age and medication were robust predictors to cognitive performance of both SAD and BD patients.
Our results point out the worse cognitive outcome of SAD compared to BD patients in remission. Remarkably, the variance is higher for some of the test results between the groups than within each group, this being discussed in light of the contradictive concept of SAD.
多项研究表明,即使在病情稳定的双相情感障碍(BD)患者和分裂情感障碍(SAD)患者中,也存在持续的神经认知障碍。我们的研究目的是比较这两组患者的神经心理学表现。通过控制混杂变量,我们可以更好地了解 BD 和 SAD 患者的认知功能障碍。
我们使用神经心理学测试组合,对 28 名病情稳定的 SAD 患者和 32 名 BD 患者的多个神经认知功能领域(执行功能、记忆、注意力、集中力和感知运动功能)进行了检查。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)和杨氏躁狂评定量表(YMRS)评估患者的临床状况。数据分析采用多元协方差分析(ANCOVA/MANCOVA)。
在包括陈述性记忆和注意力在内的测试领域,病情稳定的 SAD 患者比病情稳定的 BD 患者表现出更大的认知障碍。当控制人口统计学和临床变量时,关于认知灵活性的假定显著组间差异消失了。年龄和药物是 SAD 和 BD 患者认知表现的强有力预测因素。
我们的研究结果表明,与缓解期的 BD 患者相比,SAD 患者的认知结果更差。值得注意的是,与每个组内相比,组间的一些测试结果的差异更大,这一点将根据 SAD 的矛盾概念进行讨论。