Suppr超能文献

经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术期间并发症最小化——输尿管支架置入有必要吗?

Minimizing complications during retropubic radical prostatectomy - Is ureteral stenting necessary?

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2010 Mar 30;15(3):121-3. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-3-121.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND AIMS

To avoid damage to the ureters during bladder neck preparation in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, it may be helpful to insert ureteral stents temporarily or to intravenously administer indigo carmine dye for enhanced visualisation of ureteric orifices. We evaluated our bladder neck preserving technique at radical prostatectomy with regard to ureteric injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed 369 consecutive radical prostatectomies operated in our clinic in a bladder neck preserving technique. The following parameters were assessed in this retrospective study: number of prophylactic ureteric stent insertions, application of indigo carmine dye, observed injuries of the ureters by the surgeon, postoperative increase of serum creatinine and postoperative status of kidney ultrasound.

RESULTS

In 7/369 prostatectomies (1.90%) a ureteric stent insertion was performed, indigo carmine was not applied to any patient at all, yet no intraoperative injury of a ureter was observed by a surgeon. No revision was necessary due to a ureteral injury within the observation period of one year after surgery. In 17 patients with preoperative normal creatinine value a pathological value was observed on the first postoperative day (mean 1.4 mg/dl). In these patients no consecutive postrenal acute renal failure was observed, no hydronephrosis was monitored by ultrasound and no further intervention was necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder neck preserving operation technique does not implicate the need of prophylactic ureteric stent insertions and has no higher incidence of ureteric injuries.

摘要

目的和目标

在根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌期间,为避免在膀胱颈部准备过程中损伤输尿管,暂时插入输尿管支架或静脉内给予靛胭脂染料以增强输尿管口的可视化可能会有所帮助。我们评估了在根治性前列腺切除术时保留膀胱颈部技术对输尿管损伤的影响。

患者和方法

我们分析了在我们的泌尿科采用膀胱颈部保留技术连续进行的 369 例根治性前列腺切除术。在这项回顾性研究中评估了以下参数:预防性输尿管支架插入的数量、靛胭脂染料的应用、外科医生观察到的输尿管损伤、术后血清肌酐的增加以及术后肾脏超声的状态。

结果

在 369 例前列腺切除术中有 7 例(1.90%)进行了输尿管支架插入,没有对任何患者应用靛胭脂染料,但没有外科医生观察到输尿管术中损伤。在术后 1 年的观察期内,没有因输尿管损伤而需要进行修正。在术前肌酐值正常的 17 例患者中,术后第 1 天观察到病理性值(平均 1.4mg/dl)。在这些患者中,未观察到继发于肾后急性肾衰竭,超声未监测到肾积水,且无需进一步干预。

结论

保留膀胱颈部手术技术不意味着需要预防性输尿管支架插入,且输尿管损伤的发生率没有增加。

相似文献

3
Ureteral reimplantation for inadvertent ureteral injury during radical perineal prostatectomy.
Urology. 2003 Nov;62(5):941. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00683-6.

本文引用的文献

4
Total prostatovesiculectomy; retropubic approach.全前列腺精囊切除术;耻骨后入路。
J Urol. 1949 Sep;62(3):340-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68931-6.
5
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.欧洲泌尿外科学会前列腺癌指南。
Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
7
Nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.保留神经的开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术
Eur Urol. 2007 Jan;51(1):90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.013. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
8
Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004.2004年欧洲的癌症发病率和死亡率
Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):481-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi098. Epub 2005 Feb 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验