• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别老年创伤患者中的危及生命的休克:对国家创伤数据库的分析。

Identifying life-threatening shock in the older injured patient: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

作者信息

Zarzaur Ben L, Croce Martin A, Magnotti Louis J, Fabian Timothy C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1134-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d87488.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d87488
PMID:20453769
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reliance on traditional vital signs (TVS), particularly in older patients, to identify life-threatening shock after injury may be unreliable. Shock index (SI), defined as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure (SBP), may be a better indicator of early shock after injury than TVS. Multiplying age by SI (age x SI) may be better in older injured patients. We hypothesized that age x SI would be a better predictor of 48-hour mortality in old patients (age, >55 years) compared with TVS, whereas for young patients (age, <or=55 years), SI would be a better predictor than TVS.

METHODS

Version 8.1 of the National Trauma Data Bank was queried for incidents of blunt, non-neurologic injury occurring during 2007, to patients aged 18 to 81 years. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were compared for TVS, SI, and age x SI in young and old patients for predicting 48-hour mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 189,574 incidents were identified. Overall 48-hour mortality was 1.18%. For young patients, there was no difference between SBP (AUC, 0.654) and SI (AUC, 0.655) for predicting 48-hour mortality. For old patients, age x SI (AUC, 0.693) was a better predictor of 48-hour mortality compared with heart rate (AUC, 0.626; p < 0.0001), SBP (AUC, 0.657; p < 0.0002), or SI (AUC, 0.684; p < 0.008).

CONCLUSION

TVS are inadequate predictors of shock after non-neurologic blunt injury. Using SI in the young and age x SI in old to identify patients at risk for early mortality after blunt injury could result in earlier definitive treatment.

摘要

目的

依靠传统生命体征(TVS),尤其是在老年患者中,来识别受伤后危及生命的休克可能并不可靠。休克指数(SI)定义为心率除以收缩压(SBP),与TVS相比,可能是受伤后早期休克的更好指标。将年龄乘以SI(年龄×SI)在老年受伤患者中可能更适用。我们假设,与TVS相比,年龄×SI对老年患者(年龄>55岁)48小时死亡率的预测效果更好,而对于年轻患者(年龄≤55岁),SI比TVS是更好的预测指标。

方法

查询2007年期间国家创伤数据库8.1版本中18至81岁患者发生钝性非神经损伤的事件。比较年轻和老年患者中TVS、SI和年龄×SI预测48小时死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

共识别出189,574起事件。总体48小时死亡率为1.18%。对于年轻患者,预测48小时死亡率时收缩压(AUC为0.654)和SI(AUC为0.655)之间无差异。对于老年患者,与心率(AUC为0.626;p<0.0001)、收缩压(AUC为0.657;p<0.0002)或SI(AUC为0.684;p<0.008)相比,年龄×SI(AUC为0.693)是48小时死亡率的更好预测指标。

结论

TVS不足以预测非神经钝性损伤后的休克。在年轻患者中使用SI,在老年患者中使用年龄×SI来识别钝性损伤后有早期死亡风险的患者,可能会使确定性治疗更早进行。

相似文献

1
Identifying life-threatening shock in the older injured patient: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.识别老年创伤患者中的危及生命的休克:对国家创伤数据库的分析。
J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1134-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d87488.
2
New vitals after injury: shock index for the young and age x shock index for the old.受伤后的新生命体征:年轻人的休克指数与老年人的年龄×休克指数。
J Surg Res. 2008 Jun 15;147(2):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.025. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
3
The value of traditional vital signs, shock index, and age-based markers in predicting trauma mortality.传统生命体征、休克指数和基于年龄的标志物在预测创伤死亡率中的价值。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1432-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829246c7.
4
Normal presenting vital signs are unreliable in geriatric blunt trauma victims.正常的生命体征表现对于老年钝性创伤受害者来说并不可靠。
J Trauma. 2010 Oct;69(4):813-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f41af8.
5
Prognostic determinants in duodenal injuries.十二指肠损伤的预后决定因素。
Am Surg. 2004 Mar;70(3):248-55; discussion 255.
6
Pulmonary artery catheter use is associated with reduced mortality in severely injured patients: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis of 53,312 patients.肺动脉导管的使用与严重受伤患者死亡率降低相关:一项对53312名患者的国家创伤数据库分析。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1597-601. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217918.03343.AA.
7
Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients.休克指数在预测创伤患者死亡率中的应用。
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1426-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bbf728.
8
Shock index predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.休克指数预测老年创伤患者的死亡率:国家创伤数据库分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Apr;76(4):1111-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000160.
9
Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma.保险状况是钝性和穿透性创伤结局的一个有力预测因素。
Am J Surg. 2010 Apr;199(4):554-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005.
10
Identifying risk for massive transfusion in the relatively normotensive patient: utility of the prehospital shock index.识别相对血压正常患者大量输血的风险:院前休克指数的效用
J Trauma. 2011 Feb;70(2):384-8; discussion 388-90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182095a0a.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomarkers help identify critically injured patients with only moderate risk of severe injuries in trauma team activation.生物标志物有助于在创伤团队启动时识别出仅具有中度重伤风险的重伤患者。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 11;51(1):226. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02896-6.
2
Influence of age-adjusted shock index trajectories on 30-day mortality for critical patients with septic shock.年龄校正休克指数轨迹对感染性休克重症患者30天死亡率的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 9;12:1534706. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1534706. eCollection 2025.
3
Combination of reverse shock index and simplified motor score as a strong discriminator of trauma outcomes.
反向休克指数与简化运动评分相结合作为创伤结局的有力判别指标。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2458205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
The Respiratory Rate, Age, and Mean Arterial Pressure (RAM) Index: A Novel Prognostic Tool to Predict Mortality among Adult Patients with Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department.呼吸频率、年龄和平均动脉压指数:一种预测急诊科成人急性心力衰竭患者死亡率的新预后工具。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 30;60(9):1423. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091423.
5
The Association of Blood Banks per City with Mortality Due to Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock in Colombia: A Population-Based Analysis.哥伦比亚各城市血库与创伤性失血性休克死亡率的关联:一项基于人群的分析。
Int J Med Stud. 2023 Jan-Mar;11(1):22-28. doi: 10.5195/ijms.2023.1421. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Predicting mortality among patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia based on admission vital sign indices: a retrospective cohort study.基于入院生命体征指数预测重症 COVID-19 肺炎患者的死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Sep 12;23(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02643-w.
7
The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department.休克指数对急诊收治烧伤患者预后的影响。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Jul;29(7):786-791. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.29677.
8
Improving prehospital traumatic shock care: implementation and clinical effectiveness of a pragmatic, quasi-experimental trial in a resource-constrained South African setting.改善院前创伤性休克救治:在资源有限的南非环境中实施和评估一项实用、准实验性试验的临床效果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e060338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060338.
9
Shock index, modified shock index, age shock index score, and reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale predicting clinical outcomes in traumatic brain injury: Evidence from a 10-year analysis in a single center.休克指数、改良休克指数、年龄休克指数评分以及反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷量表对创伤性脑损伤临床结局的预测:来自单中心10年分析的证据
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 22;9:999481. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.999481. eCollection 2022.
10
Outcomes of Trauma Patients Present to the Emergency Department with a Shock Index of ≥1.0.休克指数≥1.0的创伤患者在急诊科的治疗结果。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_86_21. Epub 2022 Apr 4.