Suppr超能文献

传统生命体征、休克指数和基于年龄的标志物在预测创伤死亡率中的价值。

The value of traditional vital signs, shock index, and age-based markers in predicting trauma mortality.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Karl Bremer Hospital, Bellville, South Africa.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1432-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829246c7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate are poor predictors of trauma outcome. We postulate that HR/SBP (shock index [SI]) and novel new markers SI × age (SIA), SBP / age (BPAI), maximum HR (220 - age) - HR (minpulse [MP]), and HR / maximum HR (pulse max index [PMI]) are better predictors of 48-hour mortality compared with traditional vital signs.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Trauma Audit and Research Network database. Exclusions included any head or spine injury and prehospital intubation or cardiac arrest. Area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) was determined for 48-hour mortality for all variables and age. A threshold for each marker was derived using the specificity (rule-in) cutoffs at both 90% and 95% from the receiver operator characteristic curve. Positive likelihood ratios were described for each marker's derived threshold.

RESULTS

Vital signs, markers, and age were all significantly associated with 48-hour mortality (p < 0.001). HR, SBP, and respiratory rate fared worst overall (AUROC = 0.69, 0.66, and 0.66, respectively). SIA, MP, PMI, BPAI, and SI were significantly (p < 0.05) better than age at predicting 48-hour mortality (AUROC = 0.79, 0.77, 0.77, 0.74, 0.73, and 0.68, respectively; AUROC for age = 0.68). Thresholds derived for these five markers were values 55 or greater, 44 or less, 70% or greater, 1.5 or less, and 0.9 or greater, respectively, each with a specificity of 95% for 48-hour mortality (positive likelihood ratios were 8.4, 6.1, 6.7, 6.6, and 7.5, respectively). The likelihood of death in 48 hours was 8.4 times more likely if SIA was greater than 55 than if it was lower.

CONCLUSION

Older age seems to be significantly associated with early mortality. Newer markers, especially those combining traditional vital signs with age (SIA, BPAI, MP, and PMI), may contribute to better trauma triage of patients with blunt injuries than traditional vital signs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

摘要

背景

收缩压(SBP)、心率(HR)和呼吸频率是创伤结局的不良预测指标。我们推测,HR/SBP(休克指数[SI])和新的标记物 SI×年龄(SIA)、SBP/年龄(BPAI)、最大 HR(220-年龄)-HR(minpulse [MP])和 HR/最大 HR(脉搏最大指数[PMI])比传统生命体征更好地预测 48 小时死亡率。

方法

从创伤审核和研究网络数据库中提取数据。排除标准包括任何头部或脊柱损伤以及院前插管或心脏骤停。确定了所有变量和年龄的 48 小时死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。使用来自受试者工作特征曲线的特异性(纳入)截止值 90%和 95%,为每个标记物推导出一个阈值。对于每个标记物的推导阈值,描述了阳性似然比。

结果

生命体征、标记物和年龄均与 48 小时死亡率显著相关(p<0.001)。HR、SBP 和呼吸频率总体表现最差(AUROC 分别为 0.69、0.66 和 0.66)。SIA、MP、PMI、BPAI 和 SI 显著(p<0.05)优于年龄预测 48 小时死亡率(AUROC 分别为 0.79、0.77、0.77、0.74、0.73 和 0.68;年龄的 AUROC 为 0.68)。为这五个标记物推导的阈值分别为 55 或更高、44 或更低、70%或更高、1.5 或更低和 0.9 或更高,每个标记物的特异性为 95%用于 48 小时死亡率(阳性似然比分别为 8.4、6.1、6.7、6.6 和 7.5)。如果 SIA 大于 55,则 48 小时内死亡的可能性是 SIA 较低时的 8.4 倍。

结论

年龄较大似乎与早期死亡率显著相关。较新的标记物,特别是将传统生命体征与年龄相结合的标记物(SIA、BPAI、MP 和 PMI),可能比传统生命体征更有助于对钝性创伤患者进行更好的创伤分诊。

证据水平

预后/流行病学研究,III 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验