Centre Hospitalier du Bassin de Thau, Sète, France.
Can J Microbiol. 2010 Mar;56(3):217-28. doi: 10.1139/w10-006.
A collection of 50 aeromonads isolated from environmental sources were studied, together with all known Aeromonas nomenspecies, by phenotypic, amplified 16S rDNA restriction analysis (16S rDNA RFLP) and by partial sequence alignment of both 16S rDNA and rpoB genes. Although most of the type strain showed a unique phenotypic pattern, a database constructed on type strain phenotype allowed the identification of only 24% of the isolates. Analysis of 16S rDNA RFLP and the rpoB sequence were almost concordant in identifying environmental isolates at the species level, except for strains belonging to Aeromonas caviae spp., which were not differentiated from Aeromonas aquariorum, nor Aeromonas hydrophila susbsp. dhakensis by 16S rDNA RFLP. In addition, rpoB gene analysis clustered separately a group of isolates found in snails within the A. hydrophila species. In contrast to 16S rDNA RFLP and rpoB, the partial 16S rDNA sequence analysis was weak in resolving species identity. Part of these results, phenotypic and phylogenetic data, showed that Aeromonas molluscorum and Aeromonas sharmana are distant from all other Aeromonas species and that the type species of A. hydrophila subsp. anaerogenes is similar to A. caviae and should be considered synonymous.
从环境来源中分离出的 50 株气单胞菌与所有已知的气单胞菌属名种一起,通过表型、扩增 16S rDNA 限制分析(16S rDNA RFLP)和 16S rDNA 和 rpoB 基因的部分序列比对进行了研究。尽管大多数模式株表现出独特的表型模式,但基于模式株表型构建的数据库仅能识别出 24%的分离株。16S rDNA RFLP 和 rpoB 序列分析在鉴定环境分离株的种水平上几乎一致,除了属于 Aeromonas caviae spp.的菌株外,它们不能通过 16S rDNA RFLP 与 Aeromonas aquariorum 或 Aeromonas hydrophila susbsp. dhakensis 区分开来。此外,rpoB 基因分析将在蜗牛中发现的一组分离株聚类到 A. hydrophila 种内。与 16S rDNA RFLP 和 rpoB 相比,部分 16S rDNA 序列分析在解决种间身份方面较弱。这些结果的一部分,表型和系统发育数据表明,Aeromonas molluscorum 和 Aeromonas sharmana 与所有其他气单胞菌属种都有很大的距离,而 A. hydrophila subsp. anaerogenes 的模式种与 Aeromonas caviae 相似,应被视为同义词。