Li Kaccie Y, Mishra Sandipan, Tiruveedhula Pavan, Roorda Austin
vision science group in the School of Optometry at the University of California at Berkeley, USA.
Proc Am Control Conf. 2009 Jun 10;2009:3848-3853. doi: 10.1109/ACC.2009.5159832.
We compared four algorithms for controlling a MEMS deformable mirror of an adaptive optics (AO) scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Interferometer measurements of the static nonlinear response of the deformable mirror were used to form an equivalent linear model of the AO system so that the classic integrator plus wavefront reconstructor type controller can be implemented. The algorithms differ only in the design of the wavefront reconstructor. The comparisons were made for two eyes (two individuals) via a series of imaging sessions. All four controllers performed similarly according to estimated residual wavefront error not reflecting the actual image quality observed. A metric based on mean image intensity did consistently reflect the qualitative observations of retinal image quality. Based on this metric, the controller most effective for suppressing the least significant modes of the deformable mirror performed the best.
我们比较了用于控制自适应光学(AO)扫描激光检眼镜的微机电系统(MEMS)变形镜的四种算法。利用干涉仪对变形镜静态非线性响应的测量来形成AO系统的等效线性模型,以便能够实现经典的积分器加波前重构器类型的控制器。这些算法仅在波前重构器的设计上有所不同。通过一系列成像实验对两只眼睛(两个个体)进行了比较。根据估计的残余波前误差,所有四个控制器的表现相似,但这并未反映出实际观察到的图像质量。基于平均图像强度的指标确实始终反映了视网膜图像质量的定性观察结果。基于该指标,对抑制变形镜最不重要模式最有效的控制器表现最佳。