Lerman Jerrold, Hammer Gregory B, Verghese Susan, Ehlers Melissa, Khalil Samia N, Betts Eugene, Trillo Raul, Deutsch Jonathan
Department of Anesthesia, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14222, USA.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Jun;20(6):495-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03305.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
We sought to characterize the airway responses to desflurane during maintenance of and emergence from anesthesia in children whose airways were supported with laryngeal mask airways (LMAs).
METHODS/MATERIALS: Four hundred healthy children were randomized in a 3 : 1 ratio to either desflurane or isoflurane (reference group) during anesthetic maintenance. After induction of anesthesia, anesthesia was maintained with the designated anesthetic. The investigator chose the airway (LMA and facemask), ventilation strategy and when to remove the LMA. The incidence of airway events during maintenance, emergence and recovery was recorded.
Ninety percent of children received LMAs. The frequency of major airway events after desflurane (9%) was similar to that after isoflurane (4%) (number needed to harm [NNH] 20), although the frequency of major events after the LMA was removed during deep desflurane anesthesia (15%) was greater than during awake removal (5%) (NNH 10) (P < 0.006) and during deep isoflurane removal (2%) (NNH 8) (P < 0.03). The frequency of airway events of any severity after desflurane was greater than that after isoflurane (39% vs 27%) (P < 0.05). The frequencies of laryngospasm and coughing of any severity after desflurane were greater than those after isoflurane (13% vs 5% and 26% vs 14%, respectively) (P < 0.05).
When an LMA is used during desflurane anesthesia in children, fewer airway events occur when it is removed when the child is awake. Although the time to discharge from recovery was not delayed and no child required overnight admission, caution should be exercised when using an LMA in children who are anesthetized with desflurane.
我们试图描述在使用喉罩气道(LMA)维持气道的儿童麻醉维持期及苏醒期七氟醚对气道的反应。
方法/材料:400名健康儿童在麻醉维持期按3:1比例随机分为七氟醚组或异氟醚组(参照组)。麻醉诱导后,用指定的麻醉剂维持麻醉。研究者选择气道(LMA和面罩)、通气策略以及LMA移除时间。记录维持期、苏醒期及恢复期气道事件的发生率。
90%的儿童使用了LMA。七氟醚麻醉后主要气道事件的发生率(9%)与异氟醚麻醉后(4%)相似(伤害所需人数[NNH]为20),尽管在七氟醚深麻醉期移除LMA后主要事件的发生率(15%)高于清醒时移除(5%)(NNH为10)(P<0.006)以及异氟醚深麻醉期移除(2%)(NNH为8)(P<0.03)。七氟醚麻醉后任何严重程度的气道事件发生率均高于异氟醚麻醉(39%对27%)(P<0.05)。七氟醚麻醉后任何严重程度的喉痉挛和咳嗽发生率均高于异氟醚麻醉(分别为13%对5%和26%对14%)(P<0.05)。
儿童七氟醚麻醉期间使用LMA时,清醒时移除LMA发生气道事件较少。尽管恢复出院时间未延迟且无儿童需要过夜住院,但在使用七氟醚麻醉的儿童中使用LMA时仍应谨慎。