• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创手术伤口感染:腹腔镜手术降低了手术部位感染的发病率,并降低了伤口护理的成本。

Minimally invasive surgical wound infections: laparoscopic surgery decreases morbidity of surgical site infections and decreases the cost of wound care.

机构信息

The Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jul;13(7):811-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02302.x. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02302.x
PMID:20456462
Abstract

AIM

The morbidity of surgical site infections (SSIs) were compared in patients who underwent open (OS) vs laparoscopic (LS) colorectal surgery.

METHOD

Data from 603 consecutive LS patients and 2246 consecutive OS patients were prospectively recorded. Morbidity of SSIs was assessed by the need for emergency department (ED) evaluation, subsequent hospital re-admission and re-operation. The cost of wound care was measured by the need for home healthcare, wound vacuum assisted closure (VAC) or independent patient wound care.

RESULTS

SSIs were identified in 5.8% (n = 25) of LS patients and 4.8% (n = 65) of OS patients. ED evaluation for the infection was needed in 24% of the LS group and 42% of the OS group. Hospital re-admission was needed in one LS patient and in 52% OS patients. No LS patient needed re-operation compared with 12% of OS patients. HHC ($162/dressing change) was required in 63% of the OS group compared with 8% of LS group. A home wound VAC system ($107/day) was utilized in 12% of the OS patients but in none of the LS patients. Dressing changes were managed independently by the patient in 92% of the LS compared with 37% of the OS patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery patients experience less morbidity when they develop SSIs incurring less cost compared with open colorectal surgery patients.

摘要

目的

比较接受开放式(OS)与腹腔镜(LS)结直肠手术的患者的手术部位感染(SSI)发病率。

方法

前瞻性记录了 603 例连续 LS 患者和 2246 例连续 OS 患者的数据。通过急诊(ED)评估、随后的医院再入院和再手术的需要来评估 SSI 的发病率。通过家庭医疗保健、伤口真空辅助闭合(VAC)或独立患者伤口护理的需要来衡量伤口护理的成本。

结果

LS 患者中 SSI 的发生率为 5.8%(n=25),OS 患者中为 4.8%(n=65)。感染的 LS 组中有 24%需要 ED 评估,OS 组中有 42%。1 例 LS 患者和 52%的 OS 患者需要再入院。与 OS 患者的 12%相比,没有 LS 患者需要再次手术。与 LS 组的 8%相比,OS 组中有 63%需要 HHC(每次换药 162 美元)。OS 患者中有 12%使用了家庭伤口 VAC 系统(每天 107 美元),但 LS 患者中没有。LS 患者中有 92%的患者可以独立管理伤口敷料更换,而 OS 患者中只有 37%。

结论

与开放式结直肠手术患者相比,腹腔镜结直肠手术患者在发生 SSI 时发病率较低,成本较低。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive surgical wound infections: laparoscopic surgery decreases morbidity of surgical site infections and decreases the cost of wound care.微创手术伤口感染:腹腔镜手术降低了手术部位感染的发病率,并降低了伤口护理的成本。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jul;13(7):811-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02302.x. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
2
[Introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura].[腹腔镜脾切除术治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜的介绍]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Apr;129(2):108-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-818730.
3
Surgical site infections after abdominal closure in colorectal surgery using triclosan-coated absorbable suture (PDS Plus) vs. uncoated sutures (PDS II): a randomized multicenter study.腹部闭合术后使用三氯生涂层可吸收缝线(PDS Plus)与未涂层缝线(PDS II)治疗结直肠手术部位感染的随机多中心研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Dec;12(6):483-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.001. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
4
Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program.腹腔镜方法显著降低结直肠手术后手术部位感染:来自国家手术质量改进计划的数据。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Aug;211(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.028. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
5
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy decreases the incidence and morbidity of surgical site infections.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术可降低手术部位感染的发生率和发病率。
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):827-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.037. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
6
Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly.老年患者的腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术
Br J Surg. 1999 Jul;86(7):938-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01160.x.
7
Surgical site infections and cost in obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery.接受结直肠手术的肥胖患者的手术部位感染与费用
Arch Surg. 2011 Sep;146(9):1068-72. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.117. Epub 2011 May 16.
8
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the pediatric population: a contemporary single-center experience.小儿腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术:当代单中心经验
Am Surg. 2001 Sep;67(9):859-63; discussion 863-4.
9
Vacuum-assisted closure as a treatment modality for infections after cardiac surgery.真空辅助闭合术作为心脏手术后感染的一种治疗方式。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Feb;125(2):301-5. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.74.
10
["Fast-track" and elective, laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery].“快速康复”与择期腹腔镜结直肠手术
Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Aug;132(4):342-8; discussion 348-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981204.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急诊情况下腹腔镜与开放结直肠手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Sep 14;2(3):e097. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000097. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
The Strategy to Use Sugammadex to Reduce Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after da Vinci Surgery: A Retrospective Study.使用舒更葡糖钠减少达芬奇手术后肺部并发症的策略:一项回顾性研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):52. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010052.
3
Cost comparisons of endoscopic and surgical resection of stage T1 rectal cancer.
T1期直肠癌内镜切除与手术切除的成本比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1512-E1519. doi: 10.1055/a-1522-8762. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Implementation of the policy protocol for management of surgical and non-surgical wounds in selected public health facilities in Ghana: An analytic case study.加纳部分公共卫生机构手术及非手术伤口管理政策协议的实施:一项分析性案例研究
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0234874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234874. eCollection 2020.
5
Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection in Mini-invasive Urological Surgery.微创泌尿外科手术中手术部位感染的评估
Open Med (Wars). 2019 Sep 15;14:711-718. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0081. eCollection 2019.
6
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.支持和制约机器人辅助手术实施的因素:一项现实主义访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e028635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635.
7
A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population.医疗保险人群中行肝胰切除术的开放式手术与微创手术的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Dec;22(12):2088-2096. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3883-x. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
Impact of Robotic Surgery on Decision Making: Perspectives of Surgical Teams.机器人手术对外科团队决策的影响:外科团队的观点。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1057-66. eCollection 2015.
9
Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门和腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后的短期结局
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Apr;20(4):227-34. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1421-3. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Obese patients have similar short-term outcomes to non-obese in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.肥胖患者在腹腔镜结直肠手术中的短期预后与非肥胖患者相似。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct 27;7(10):261-6. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.261.