Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Dec;21(6):824-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01118.x. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
The objective of this study was to compare incidences and patterns of injury for female and male elite teams when playing football on artificial turf and grass. Twenty teams (15 male, 5 female) playing home matches on third-generation artificial turf were followed prospectively; their injury risk when playing on artificial turf pitches was compared with the risk when playing on grass. Individual exposure, injuries (time loss) and injury severity were recorded by the team medical staff. In total, 2105 injuries were recorded during 246,000 h of exposure to football. Seventy-one percent of the injuries were traumatic and 29% overuse injuries. There were no significant differences in the nature of overuse injuries recorded on artificial turf and grass for either men or women. The incidence (injuries/1000 player-hours) of acute (traumatic) injuries did not differ significantly between artificial turf and grass, for men (match 22.4 v 21.7; RR 1.0 (95% CI 0.9-1.2); training 3.5 v 3.5; RR 1.0 (0.8-1.2)) or women [match 14.9 v 12.5; RR 1.2 (0.8-1.8); training 2.9 v 2.8; RR 1.0 (0.6-1.7)]. During matches, men were less likely to sustain a quadriceps strain (P=0.031) and more likely to sustain an ankle sprain (P=0.040) on artificial turf.
本研究的目的是比较女性和男性精英足球队在人造草皮和天然草皮上踢球时的受伤发生率和模式。20 支球队（15 支男队，5 支女队）在第三代人造草皮上进行主场比赛，前瞻性地跟踪他们在人造草皮场地踢球时的受伤风险，并将其与在天然草皮场地踢球时的风险进行比较。由队医记录个人暴露、受伤（伤停时间）和受伤严重程度。在总计 246000 小时的足球暴露时间里，共记录了 2105 次受伤。71%的损伤为创伤性，29%为过度使用性损伤。无论是男性还是女性，在人造草皮和天然草皮上记录的过度使用性损伤性质均无显著差异。急性（创伤性）损伤的发生率（损伤/1000 名球员小时）在人造草皮和天然草皮之间没有显著差异，对于男性（比赛 22.4 比 21.7；RR 1.0（95%CI 0.9-1.2）；训练 3.5 比 3.5；RR 1.0（0.8-1.2））或女性[比赛 14.9 比 12.5；RR 1.2（0.8-1.8）；训练 2.9 比 2.8；RR 1.0（0.6-1.7）]。在比赛中，男性在人造草皮上更不易发生股四头肌拉伤（P=0.031），而更易发生踝关节扭伤（P=0.040）。
