Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012 Jun;22(3):356-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01174.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate the risk of acute injuries among youth male and female footballers playing on third-generation artificial turf compared with grass. Over 60,000 players 13-19 years of age were followed in four consecutive Norway Cup tournaments from 2005 to 2008. Injuries were recorded prospectively by the team coaches throughout each tournament. The overall incidence of injuries was 39.2 (SD: 0.8) per 1000 match hours; 34.2 (SD: 2.4) on artificial turf and 39.7 (SD: 0.8) on grass. After adjusting for the potential confounders age and gender, there was no difference in the overall risk of injury [odds ratio (OR): 0.93 (0.77-1.12), P=0.44] or in the risk of time loss injury [OR: 1.05 (0.68-1.61), P=0.82] between artificial turf and grass. However, there was a lower risk of ankle injuries [OR: 0.59 (0.40-0.88), P=0.008], and a higher risk of back and spine [OR: 1.92 (1.10-3.36), P=0.021] and shoulder and collarbone injuries [OR: 2.32 (1.01-5.31), P=0.049], on artificial turf compared with on grass. In conclusion, there was no difference in the overall risk of acute injury in youth footballers playing on third-generation artificial turf compared with grass.
本前瞻性队列研究旨在调查与天然草皮相比，在第三代人工草皮上踢球的青少年男性和女性足球运动员急性损伤的风险。在 2005 年至 2008 年的连续四届挪威杯比赛中，有超过 6 万名 13-19 岁的球员被跟踪。在整个比赛过程中，由球队教练对受伤情况进行前瞻性记录。总的受伤发生率为每 1000 比赛小时 39.2（SD：0.8）；在人工草皮上为 34.2（SD：2.4），在天然草皮上为 39.7（SD：0.8）。在调整了潜在的混杂因素年龄和性别后，人工草皮和天然草皮之间的总体受伤风险没有差异[比值比（OR）：0.93（0.77-1.12），P=0.44]或受伤时间损失风险[OR：1.05（0.68-1.61），P=0.82]。然而，人工草皮上踝关节受伤的风险较低[OR：0.59（0.40-0.88），P=0.008]，而背部和脊柱受伤[OR：1.92（1.10-3.36），P=0.021]和肩部和锁骨受伤[OR：2.32（1.01-5.31），P=0.049]的风险较高。总之，与天然草皮相比，在第三代人工草皮上踢球的青少年足球运动员急性损伤的总体风险没有差异。
