• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠道准备:比较使用磷酸钠/聚乙二醇时的代谢和电解质变化。

Bowel preparation: comparing metabolic and electrolyte changes when using sodium phosphate/polyethylene glycol.

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):356-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.009
PMID:20457286
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients with various types of colonic pathology undergo invasive procedures that require mechanical bowel preparation. The most commonly used medications for bowel preparation include phosphate-containing drugs which are low cost and enable this procedure to be performed in an outpatient setting, as opposed to other medications, such as polyethylene glycol. Recent studies have suggested that freely using phosphate-containing drugs might lead to renal function impairment in a small group of patients. Despite this, many surgeons still use these drugs to prepare their patients. We conducted a comparative study to check the side effects of phosphate-containing drugs compared to polyethylene glycol when used for bowel cleansing.

METHODS

We conducted a double blind prospective randomized study that included 40 patients undergoing surgery for colonic pathology, all of whom underwent bowel cleansing (20 with sodium phosphate and 20 with polyethylene glycol). During the perioperative course, electrolyte parameters were collected from serum and urine and compared between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

Changes in electrolyte and metabolic parameters were shown in both groups, but more prominently in patients prepared with sodium phosphate. In addition, early signs of renal function impairment appeared in this group. The differences in metabolic and electrolyte changes between the two groups were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this study, we propose that the wide use of phosphate-containing drugs for colonic preparation might be dangerous for the specific group of patients that is prone to develop renal failure or electrolyte abnormalities.

摘要

背景

许多患有各种类型结肠疾病的患者需要接受侵入性的治疗程序,这些程序需要进行机械肠道准备。最常用于肠道准备的药物包括含磷酸盐的药物,这些药物成本低廉,可以在门诊环境中进行操作,而不是使用其他药物,如聚乙二醇。最近的研究表明,在一小部分患者中,自由使用含磷酸盐的药物可能会导致肾功能损害。尽管如此,许多外科医生仍然使用这些药物来为患者进行肠道准备。我们进行了一项对比研究,以检查含磷酸盐药物与聚乙二醇在用于肠道清洁时的副作用。

方法

我们进行了一项双盲前瞻性随机研究,共纳入 40 名因结肠疾病而行手术的患者,所有患者均进行肠道清洁(20 名患者使用磷酸钠,20 名患者使用聚乙二醇)。在围手术期,从血清和尿液中收集电解质参数,并在两组患者之间进行比较。

结果

两组患者的电解质和代谢参数均发生变化,但在使用磷酸钠进行肠道准备的患者中更为明显。此外,该组患者出现了早期肾功能损害的迹象。两组之间代谢和电解质变化的差异具有统计学意义。

结论

基于这项研究,我们提出,广泛使用含磷酸盐的药物进行结肠准备可能对易发生肾衰竭或电解质异常的特定患者群体存在危险。

相似文献

1
Bowel preparation: comparing metabolic and electrolyte changes when using sodium phosphate/polyethylene glycol.肠道准备:比较使用磷酸钠/聚乙二醇时的代谢和电解质变化。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):356-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 8.
2
Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.一项前瞻性随机多中心对照试验的结果,该试验比较了新型2升抗坏血酸加聚乙二醇和电解质溶液与磷酸钠溶液在接受择期结肠镜检查患者中的效果。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Dec;24(11-12):1631-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03167.x. Epub 2006 Nov 10.
3
Carbohydrate-electrolyte (E-Lyte) solution enhances bowel preparation with oral fleet phospho-soda.碳水化合物电解质(E-Lyte)溶液可增强口服磷酸钠溶液的肠道准备效果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0559-2. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
4
Clinical trial: sodium phosphate tablets are preferred and better tolerated by patients compared to polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation.临床试验:与聚乙二醇溶液加比沙可啶片用于肠道准备相比,磷酸钠片更受患者青睐且耐受性更好。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov 15;26(10):1361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03496.x.
5
A prospective randomized blinded comparison of sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for safe bowel cleansing.磷酸钠与聚乙二醇电解质溶液用于安全肠道准备的前瞻性随机双盲比较
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Feb 15;23(4):543-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02777.x.
6
Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial.聚乙二醇与磷酸钠用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验
Endoscopy. 2005 Jun;37(6):537-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861315.
7
Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.两升聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液与磷酸钠作为结肠镜检查肠道清洁方案的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2002 Jul;34(7):560-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33207.
8
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.相较于使用常规剂量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液进行结肠镜检查准备,先给予橄榄油再给予少量聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液可提高患者对右侧结肠清洁的满意度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
9
Evaluation of mechanical bowel preparation methods in urinary diversion surgery.尿流改道手术中机械性肠道准备方法的评估
Can J Urol. 2006 Oct;13(5):3250-4.
10
Comparative study on two colonic bowel preparations for patients with chronic constipation.两种结肠肠道准备方法用于慢性便秘患者的对比研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(3):375-9. doi: 10.1080/00365520802538211.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Cardiac-Electrophysiological Balance Index to Predict Arrhythmia Risk After Colonoscopy.使用心脏电生理平衡指数预测结肠镜检查后的心律失常风险。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 26;61(1):13. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010013.
2
Mechanical and oral antibiotics bowel preparation for elective rectal cancer surgery: A propensity score matching analysis using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan.择期直肠癌手术的机械性和口服抗生素肠道准备:一项使用日本全国住院患者数据库的倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Nov 29;7(3):450-457. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12641. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery.
结直肠手术后吻合口漏危险因素的最新进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 17;11(12):2382. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122382.
4
Initial experience of intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中术中荧光胆管造影的初步经验:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul 15;68:102569. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102569. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
The use of an implemented infection prevention bundle reduces the incidence of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a retrospective single center analysis.实施感染预防措施包可降低结直肠手术后手术部位感染的发生率:回顾性单中心分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Dec;73(6):2113-2124. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00960-x. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
6
Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol.前瞻性随机对照试验,使用 REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) 平台和国家手术质量改进计划 (NSQIP),比较择期结肠手术中不准备与单独术前口服抗生素预防手术部位感染率的效果:方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 9;10(7):e036866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866.
7
Outcome of no oral antibiotic prophylaxis and bowel preparation in Crohn's diseases surgery.克罗恩病手术中不进行口服抗生素预防和肠道准备的结果
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019 Mar;131(5-6):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-1475-8. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
The Role of Oral Antibiotic Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis.口服抗生素准备在择期结直肠手术中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):43-58. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003145.
9
Impact of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis.择期结直肠手术中机械性肠道准备的影响:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 28;24(4):519-536. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i4.519.
10
Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce infections after colorectal cancer surgery.术前口服抗生素可降低结直肠癌手术后的感染率。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Dec;401(8):1153-1162. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1513-1. Epub 2016 Sep 20.