Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710-3802, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):832-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.015.
To evaluate the change and difference in the corneal surface, incision, and handpiece temperatures during longitudinal and torsional ultrasound (US) phacoemulsification with standard incisions (2.75 mm) and microincisions (2.20 mm) and the thermal effect on wounds.
Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
In this prospective study, human cadaver eyes had simulated phacoemulsification. Group 1 had a 2.75 mm incision with 100% longitudinal US; Group 2, a 2.20 mm incision with 100% longitudinal US; Group 3, a 2.75 mm incision with 100% torsional US; and Group 4, a 2.20 mm incision with 100% torsional US. During phacoemulsification, the corneal incision was evaluated by surgical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and images of the corneal surface, incision, and handpiece were captured with an infrared camera.
Twelve eyes (3 each group) were evaluated. The maximum incision temperature was higher in the longitudinal groups than in the torsional groups. With the same US modality, the maximum microincision temperature was higher than the maximum standard incision temperature. After application of full power for 40 seconds, wound burn was observed in all eyes in the longitudinal groups and no eyes in the torsional groups. On SEM, there was more extensive loss of Descemet membrane in the longitudinal groups than in the torsional groups.
Incision temperature was influenced by US modality and was significantly lower with torsional US than with longitudinal US. Using torsional US with smaller incisions may decrease the risk for wound burn in eyes with denser cataracts.
评估标准切口(2.75mm)和微切口(2.20mm)下纵向和扭转超声(US)白内障乳化过程中角膜表面、切口和手柄温度的变化和差异,以及对伤口的热效应。
美国北卡罗来纳州达勒姆市杜克大学眼科系。
在这项前瞻性研究中,对人类尸体眼球进行了模拟白内障乳化。第 1 组采用 2.75mm 切口,行 100%纵向 US;第 2 组采用 2.20mm 切口,行 100%纵向 US;第 3 组采用 2.75mm 切口,行 100%扭转 US;第 4 组采用 2.20mm 切口,行 100%扭转 US。在白内障乳化过程中,通过手术显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估角膜切口,并使用红外摄像机拍摄角膜表面、切口和手柄的图像。
共评估了 12 只眼(每组 3 只)。纵向组的最大切口温度高于扭转组。在相同的 US 模式下,微切口的最大温度高于标准切口的最大温度。在全功率应用 40 秒后,纵向组的所有眼睛都观察到伤口烧伤,而扭转组的眼睛没有。在 SEM 上,纵向组的角膜后弹力层丢失比扭转组更广泛。
切口温度受 US 模式的影响,扭转 US 明显低于纵向 US。在白内障密度较高的眼中,使用较小切口的扭转 US 可能会降低伤口烧伤的风险。