Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2010 May-Jun;8(3):237-44. doi: 10.1370/afm.1114.
For clinicians, using opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) often gives rise to a conflict between treating their patients' pain and fears of addiction, diversion of medication, or legal action. Consequent stresses on clinical encounters might adversely affect some elements of clinical care. We evaluated a possible association between chronic opioid therapy (COT) for CNCP and receipt of various preventive services.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 7 primary care clinics within the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN). Using medical records of 704 patients, aged 35 to 85 years, seen during a 3-year period, we compared the receipt of 4 preventive services between patients on COT for CNCP and patients not on chronic opioid therapy (non-COT). We used multivariate log-binomial regression analyses to estimate the relative risk of receipt of each preventive service.
After adjustment for plausible confounders, we found that patients using COT had a statistically significantly lower relative risk (RR) of receipt of cervical cancer screening (RR = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.76) and colorectal cancer screening (RR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.80) when compared with non-COT patients. The RR was reduced, without statistical significance, for lipid screening (RR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.54-1.10), and not notably reduced for smoking cessation counseling (RR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.15).
Patients using COT for CNCP were less likely to receive some preventive services. Research is needed to better understand barriers to and improved methods for providing preventive services for these patients.
对于临床医生来说,在治疗慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)时使用阿片类药物往往会在治疗患者疼痛和担心成瘾、药物滥用或法律诉讼之间产生冲突。因此,临床接触的压力可能会对某些临床护理要素产生不利影响。我们评估了慢性阿片类药物治疗(COT)用于 CNCP 与接受各种预防服务之间的可能关联。
我们在俄勒冈农村实践为基础研究网络(ORPRN)的 7 个初级保健诊所进行了回顾性队列研究。我们使用了 704 名年龄在 35 至 85 岁之间的患者的医疗记录,这些患者在 3 年期间接受了治疗,我们比较了接受 COT 的 CNCP 患者和未接受慢性阿片类药物治疗(非 COT)的患者之间 4 种预防服务的接受情况。我们使用多变量对数二项式回归分析来估计接受每种预防服务的相对风险。
在调整了可能的混杂因素后,我们发现与非 COT 患者相比,使用 COT 的患者接受宫颈癌筛查(RR=0.60;95%置信区间[CI],0.47-0.76)和结直肠癌筛查(RR=0.42;95%CI,0.22-0.80)的相对风险明显较低。脂质筛查的相对风险(RR=0.77;95%CI,0.54-1.10)降低,但无统计学意义,而戒烟咨询的相对风险(RR=0.95;95%CI,0.78-1.15)则没有明显降低。
接受 COT 治疗 CNCP 的患者接受某些预防服务的可能性较低。需要进行研究以更好地了解为这些患者提供预防服务的障碍和改进方法。