Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Am J Perinatol. 2010 Nov;27(10):791-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254238. Epub 2010 May 10.
We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes following repeat cesarean delivery (CD) of women with a prior classical CD with those with a prior low transverse CD. The Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network Cesarean Delivery Registry was used to identify women with one previous CD who underwent an elective repeat CD prior to the onset of labor at ≥36 weeks. Outcomes were compared between women with a previous classical CD and those with a prior low transverse CD. Of the 7936 women who met study criteria, 122 had a prior classical CD. Women with a prior classical CD had a higher rate of classical uterine incision at repeat CD (12.73% versus 0.59%; P < 0.001), had longer total operative time and hospital stay, and had higher intensive care unit admission. Uterine dehiscence was more frequent in women with a prior classical CD (2.46% versus 0.27%, odds ratio 9.35, 95% confidence interval 1.76 to 31.93). After adjusting for confounding factors, there were no statistical differences in major maternal or neonatal morbidities between groups. Uterine dehiscence was present at repeat CD in 2.46% of women with a prior classical CD. However, major maternal morbidities were similar to those with a prior low transverse CD.
我们比较了既往行古典式剖宫产术(CD)与既往行子宫下段横切口剖宫产术(CD)的再次行 CD 的产妇和新生儿结局。使用母胎医学单位网络剖宫产登记处来确定在≥36 孕周前,有一次既往剖宫产史且在临产前行择期再次剖宫产的女性。比较了既往行古典式 CD 与既往行子宫下段横切口 CD 的女性的结局。在符合研究标准的 7936 名女性中,有 122 名既往行古典式 CD。既往行古典式 CD 的女性在再次 CD 时更倾向于行古典式子宫切口(12.73%比 0.59%;P<0.001),总手术时间和住院时间更长,且 ICU 入住率更高。既往行古典式 CD 的女性子宫破裂更常见(2.46%比 0.27%,优势比 9.35,95%置信区间 1.76 至 31.93)。调整混杂因素后,两组间主要的产妇或新生儿并发症无统计学差异。既往行古典式 CD 的女性再次 CD 时,2.46%存在子宫破裂。然而,主要的产妇并发症与既往行子宫下段横切口 CD 相似。